From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Rob Pearce <rob@flitspace.org.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] INTEL DRM DRIVERS : No LVDS hardware on Intel D410PT and D425KT
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 11:35:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526D5D0E.5090604@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131027173302.GA25812@kroah.com>
On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +0000, Rob Pearce wrote:
>> From: Rob Pearce <rob@flitspace.org.uk>
>>
>> The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
>> having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
>> the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce <rob@flitspace.org.uk>
>> ---
>> Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the D425KTW does have LVDS.
>> According to Intel's documentation, the D410PTL and D410PLTW don't.
>
> Any reason you don't want this in the stable tree as well?
>
Hi Greg,
pardon my ignorance, but I thought this was supposed to be the maintainer's call to make ?
Did I get this wrong ?
Thanks,
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-27 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-27 16:13 [PATCH] INTEL DRM DRIVERS : No LVDS hardware on Intel D410PT and D425KT Rob Pearce
2013-10-27 17:33 ` Greg KH
2013-10-27 18:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-10-27 18:29 ` Rob Pearce
2013-10-27 18:35 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-10-27 19:29 ` Daniel Vetter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-27 13:35 Rob Pearce
2013-10-27 13:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-10-27 16:06 ` Rob Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526D5D0E.5090604@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@flitspace.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.