From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
To: Ben Walton <bdwalton@gmail.com>, gitster@pobox.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid difference in tr semantics between System V and BSD
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 19:07:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526EA7C8.2020607@kdbg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382951633-6456-1-git-send-email-bdwalton@gmail.com>
Am 28.10.2013 10:13, schrieb Ben Walton:
> Solaris' tr (both /usr/bin/ and /usr/xpg4/bin) uses the System V
> semantics for tr whereby string1's length is truncated to the length
> of string2 if string2 is shorter. The BSD semantics, as used by GNU tr
> see string2 padded to the length of string1 using the final character
> in string2. POSIX explicitly doesn't specify the correct behavior
> here, making both equally valid.
>
> This difference means that Solaris' native tr implementations produce
> different results for tr ":\t\n" "\0" than GNU tr. This breaks a few
> tests in t0008-ignores.sh.
>
> Possible fixes for this are to make string2 be "\0\0\0" or "[\0*]".
>
> Instead, use perl to perform these transliterations which means we
> don't need to worry about the difference at all. Since we're replacing
> tr with perl, we also use perl to replace the sed invocations used to
> transform the files.
In other tests, we check for prerequisite PERL, i.e., we are prepared
that perl is not available. Shouldn't we do that here, too?
But OTOH, I think that we should skip as few test cases as possible in
such a basic test as t0008.
Just some food for thought...
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-28 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-18 21:17 [PATCH] Avoid broken Solaris tr Ben Walton
2013-06-18 22:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-28 9:02 ` Ben Walton
2013-10-28 9:13 ` [PATCH] Avoid difference in tr semantics between System V and BSD Ben Walton
2013-10-28 18:07 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2013-10-28 18:27 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-10-28 19:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-28 19:22 ` [PATCH] t/README: tests can use perl even with NO_PERL Jonathan Nieder
2013-10-28 19:46 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-10-28 19:54 ` Jeff King
2013-10-28 21:04 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-10-28 21:43 ` Ben Walton
2013-10-29 1:18 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/3] perl Jeff King
2013-10-29 1:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] use @@PERL@@ in built scripts Jeff King
2013-10-29 19:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-29 1:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] t: provide a perl() function which uses $PERL_PATH Jeff King
2013-10-29 1:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] t: use perl instead of "$PERL_PATH" where applicable Jeff King
2013-10-28 21:04 ` [PATCH] Avoid difference in tr semantics between System V and BSD Ben Walton
2013-10-28 21:12 ` Ben Walton
2013-10-28 21:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-28 21:40 ` Ben Walton
2013-10-28 21:43 ` Ben Walton
2013-10-28 21:43 ` Ben Walton
2013-10-30 17:39 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526EA7C8.2020607@kdbg.org \
--to=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=bdwalton@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.