From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (mail-pa0-f44.google.com [209.85.220.44]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E3BE017B5 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fb1so1278518pad.17 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:46:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dc2tqu5aWu5VTnGq+KYfmWiLTPEaSRxtoHrVh5LIXvU=; b=e5gIZA3eI4ivI4SZenoZD1xhnJ6TFljaZZY0DX9xeRoSg2jmE4WJPV03tfinAgbsuG UN1k2UjvyyTnNvElXWuj2GQy1aPnmAhmsMTOZCxx5QyRC9oFs5OBQqeKBylElbyq6Kx0 b51H1ylkecCtEB5dqz9xG/OUfqVT/Z0BSfgozEeatRwVE6p6ZTrMXHuvdd8Ys+FHUBtQ 70PRTxR9wSgIzJCpJF4fKjCu3e0FdG0Ys85NIV0V0EfGRo/t6JtUN7S75hv4NLDv4imm dVJY0xkYIyTkrgoSvFbGFTfdRwBC0gUtF4304r11OVTb4aNMfxFUulhsme+xWdUKDnLX cuWg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlKsMUEAH0ZXxLlamUahK98+77T/d9fW2jIEI7xgLP+ocp1N2odo+llI93V0Y9O0xf3bpnr X-Received: by 10.66.145.166 with SMTP id sv6mr4315759pab.31.1383155201811; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.53] (97-117-181-72.phnx.qwest.net. [97.117.181.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xe9sm6331745pab.0.2013.10.30.10.46.39 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <527145FE.9000407@boundarydevices.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:46:38 -0700 From: Eric Nelson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador , Daiane Angolini References: <52710C89.7030903@mlbassoc.com> <527116CB.1050508@mlbassoc.com> <52711B37.6050900@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm-extra][PATCH] nitrogen6x.conf: Allow kernel provider override X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:46:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Otavio, On 10/30/2013 10:29 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Daiane Angolini wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Otavio Salvador >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>>> On 2013-10-30 08:33, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>>>>> On 2013-10-30 08:10, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This change lets the user override the choice of kernel in local.conf >>>>>>>> Without it, there is no way to build any kernel, e.g. linux-imx, other >>>>>>>> than the linux-boundary version. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gary Thomas >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> I do agree with both sides. But I think you didn´t presented the >> complete set of possibilities. I mean, it´s not a "support" X >> "flexibility" fight. >> >> If nitrogen-any deserves to be flexible, so all other deserves it the same way. >> >> If it´s "wrong" for one board. It´s "wrong" for any. So, please submit >> the patch to fix all/every board. > > Agreed here. > Works for me. Gary, do you want to take the patch? Otavio asked me 'cause he was asking about our board... >> As I really don´t have an strong position for this. I would say, let´s >> change and see what´s happens. >> >> For support nightmare, we always need to say what is >> u-boot/kernel/yocto problem in this ML, so the nightmare is already >> here. > > :-( > Aww, it's not a nightmare. It's a jobs program ;) >> But, in my opinion, it´s NOT a bug fix, and should NOT be merged in dora. > > Yes I agree it is not a bugfix but I think that it'd be better to be > consistent with dora and master at this point. Most people will keep > using dora for a while and it'd be better to have this deplyed now > than see how it goes in 1.6 only. > > Comments? > Gary, did you ever think a single question mark would prompt so much discussion? I wish we had a clean "MAKEALL" to make sure nothing breaks, but that seems unlikely. Regards, Eric