From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <5271574B.5050501@quarksecurity.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:00:27 -0400 From: Joshua Brindle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Smalley CC: SELinux-NSA , Daniel J Walsh , Eric Paris , Steve Lawrence Subject: Re: Pruning dead/obsolete branches? References: <5271566F.4070207@tycho.nsa.gov> In-Reply-To: <5271566F.4070207@tycho.nsa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Stephen Smalley wrote: > Hi, > > There are a number of old branches in the selinux repo that I think can > be safely pruned, but I wanted to confirm first. > > The branches other than master are: > - autotools: last attempt to convert over to using autotools. Last > commit 2008. > > - integration: last attempt to integrate src-policy into master? Last > commit 2011. > > - queue: Eric's branch for changes queued for merging to master, kind > of a next branch. Last commit Feb 2013. > > - src-policy: source policy module work. Last commit 2010. > > - src-revert: Not really sure. Last commit 2011. > > - stable_1_0: attempt to provide a long term stable series tracking the > 1.x versions of selinux userspace for long term distro users. Last > commit 2008. Turned out to be pointless because the long term distros > did their own backporting and maintenance. > > Any reason to retain any of these branches at this point? Aside from queue +1 on removing all these. For queue, I'm not sure if it is necessary or useful, I'll let Eric chime in. -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.