From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59428)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VbfgN-0007nM-8l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:00:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VbfgE-00033E-Nj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:00:15 -0400
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52719D80.3030905@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:00:00 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHyyzzRO4GqmD76hAk5FvMXPX8=8uYLrZE3exvc_KEauqJrVVQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<526A7E71.7090203@redhat.com>
	<CAHyyzzRb0OZfXBVL5RiHSMv0Wu05bUKec6DNmbNe8fAb7h+fFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHyyzzQYhCB30UGH_WzAmafeuRRWiyLmgYG0byuuUbD56kJ1jQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHyyzzQYhCB30UGH_WzAmafeuRRWiyLmgYG0byuuUbD56kJ1jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] e1000 patch for osx
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: jacek burghardt <jaceksburghardt@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-discuss <qemu-discuss@nongnu.org>

Il 31/10/2013 00:54, jacek burghardt ha scritto:
> I wonder if anyone can post reworked patch to latest  qemu 

That's what I did 5 hours ago, though what I did was actually to look at
the bits affected by the patch and reimplement them based on the e1000
hardware spec.  Can you test the second patch I posted and see if it
works for you?

Paolo