From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56695)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1VbtMu-00032i-6f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:37:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1VbtMl-00079f-1y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:37:04 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38623 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1VbtMk-00079T-Rm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:36:54 -0400
Message-ID: <52726B02.8020500@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:36:50 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1382724449-11944-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
	<20131031140243.GA24705@zapo.xilinx.com> <527266C1.8060904@suse.de>
	<CAFEAcA_pBETP6+wUrVbp03t3O8ae61pn=obO6GoSiU49curcug@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_pBETP6+wUrVbp03t3O8ae61pn=obO6GoSiU49curcug@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>

Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>> Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pendi=
ng
>> qom-next pull, as per the QEMU Summit discussion those patches should'=
ve
>> gotten an Acked-by.
>=20
> Hmm? I don't recall this part of the discussion. If you want the
> patches to have an Acked-by from you you need to send mail
> to the list with an Acked-by line.

No, I added a Signed-off-by. It was clearly stated that a Reviewed-by
needs to be explicitly sent as reply but that "looks okay" should in
exactly such a case where sender=3Dsubmaintainer should be recorded as
Acked-by, and Sob is certainly stronger than Acked-by. Cf. minutes.

Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC=
rnberg