From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: "Stephen M. Cameron" <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Cc: stephenmcameron@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thenzl@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cciss: return 0 from driver probe function on success, not 1
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:20:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5273D4DE.6060802@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131101160638.17867.37792.stgit@beardog.cce.hp.com>
On 11/01/2013 10:06 AM, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
> From: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
>
> A return value of 1 is interpreted as an error. See pci_driver.
> in local_pci_probe(). If you're wondering how this ever could
> have worked, it's because it used to be the case that only return
> values less than zero were interpreted as failure. But even in
> the current kernel if the driver registers its various entry
> points with the kernel, and then returns a value which is
> interpreted as failure, those registrations aren't undone, so
> the driver still mostly works. However, the driver's remove
> function wouldn't be called on rmmod, and pci power management
> functions wouldn't work. In the case of Smart Array, since it
> has a battery backed cache (or else no cache) even if the driver
> is not shut down properly as long as there is no outstanding
> i/o, nothing too bad happens, which is why it took so long to
> notice.
>
> Requesting backport to stable because the change to pci-driver.c
> which requires driver probe functions to return 0 occurred between
> 2.6.35 and 2.6.36 (the pci power management breakage) and again
> between 3.7 and 3.8 (pci_dev->driver getting set to NULL in
> local_pci_probe() preventing driver remove function from being
> called on rmmod.)
The original patch went in two days ago, so it's a little difficult for
me to update it unfortunately. But you can include lots of this in the
pci-driver.c warning print patch instead.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-01 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-01 16:06 [PATCH] cciss: return 0 from driver probe function on success, not 1 Stephen M. Cameron
2013-11-01 16:06 ` Stephen M. Cameron
2013-11-01 16:20 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-29 18:41 Stephen M. Cameron
2013-10-29 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
2013-10-31 21:42 ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-31 21:54 ` scameron
2013-10-31 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2013-11-01 13:06 ` Tomas Henzl
2013-11-01 13:31 ` Andrew Morton
2013-11-01 14:08 ` scameron
2013-11-01 16:27 ` Tomas Henzl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5273D4DE.6060802@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com \
--cc=scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com \
--cc=stephenmcameron@gmail.com \
--cc=thenzl@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.