From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:10:56 +0100 Message-ID: <5274779.gJQ3WSr6QB@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <20121030040237.GA10472@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:36072 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932466Ab3AIUFQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:05:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Len Brown , Taku Izumi , Jiang Liu , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , Michal Simek , Koichi Yasutake , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:01:39 AM Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> the reason why we need to change those codes for x86, we want to make it support > >> pci root bus hotplug. So it would be reasonable for us to align other > >> platform to x86 > >> changes after pci root bus hotplug change is completely done. > > > > OK, I opened https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52531 as a > > way to keep track of this consistency issue and merged > > pci/yinghai-survey-resources to my -next branch. > > Thanks a lot. will send other pci root bus hotplug out. > > question: now Rafael's tree has acpi-scan branch and it touches pci-root.c. > > so is it ok for me to base patches on your pci/next and his pm/acpi-scan? > how? > can you two have some arrangement like you pulling Rafael's branch? My acpi-scan branch is not going to be rebased going forward, so it can be pulled from safely if that helps. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.