From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 6.mo6.mail-out.ovh.net ([87.98.177.69]:42351 "EHLO
	mo6.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753802Ab3KCSLW (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 3 Nov 2013 13:11:22 -0500
Received: from mail425.ha.ovh.net (gw6.ovh.net [213.251.189.206])
	by mo6.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E4994FFA761
	for <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>; Sun,  3 Nov 2013 18:56:21 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52768E15.1020107@overkiz.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:55:33 +0100
From: boris brezillon <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
CC: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
	Fabio Porcedda <fabio.porcedda@gmail.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <groeck7@gmail.com>,
	Yang Wenyou <wenyou.yang@atmel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: various fixes
References: <20131029075028.GF19704@spo001.leaseweb.com> <1383043053-3520-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <20131029154519.GB9266@roeck-us.net> <526FE0DA.1020308@overkiz.com> <20131029164323.GF9266@roeck-us.net> <526FEEE7.7030708@overkiz.com> <527660C3.2050509@overkiz.com> <52767840.2050209@roeck-us.net>
In-Reply-To: <52767840.2050209@roeck-us.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org

On 03/11/2013 17:22, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/03/2013 06:42 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
>> Hello Guenter,
>>
>> Are you okay with the 3 fixes/improvements provided by this patch,
>> and the explanation I gave regarding the reason for these changes ?
>>
>> If so, I will submit a new series splitting the patch and including 
>> your suggestions.
>>
> Yes, sorry, I was waiting for your patches.
Done.

BTW, thanks for your review :-).
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>


From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: b.brezillon@overkiz.com (boris brezillon)
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:55:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: various fixes
In-Reply-To: <52767840.2050209@roeck-us.net>
References: <20131029075028.GF19704@spo001.leaseweb.com>
 <1383043053-3520-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
 <20131029154519.GB9266@roeck-us.net> <526FE0DA.1020308@overkiz.com>
 <20131029164323.GF9266@roeck-us.net> <526FEEE7.7030708@overkiz.com>
 <527660C3.2050509@overkiz.com> <52767840.2050209@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <52768E15.1020107@overkiz.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 03/11/2013 17:22, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/03/2013 06:42 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
>> Hello Guenter,
>>
>> Are you okay with the 3 fixes/improvements provided by this patch,
>> and the explanation I gave regarding the reason for these changes ?
>>
>> If so, I will submit a new series splitting the patch and including 
>> your suggestions.
>>
> Yes, sorry, I was waiting for your patches.
Done.

BTW, thanks for your review :-).
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>