All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm-mpath: requeue I/O during pg_init
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:10:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5278EE5F.9070208@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131105130221.GC27505@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com>

On 11/05/2013 02:02 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 11:49:56AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
>> @@ -390,7 +390,11 @@ static int map_io(struct multipath *m, struct request *clone,
>>  	if (was_queued)
>>  		m->queue_size--;
>>  
>> -	if ((pgpath && m->queue_io) ||
>> +	if (m->pg_init_required) {
>> +		if (!m->pg_init_in_progress)
>> +			queue_work(kmultipathd, &m->process_queued_ios);
>> +		r = DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE;
>> +	} else if ((pgpath && m->queue_io) ||
>>  	    (!pgpath && m->queue_if_no_path)) {
>>  		/* Queue for the daemon to resubmit */
>>  		list_add_tail(&clone->queuelist, &m->queued_ios);
> 
> This sequence if...else if... is becoming more and more unreadable!
> - Two cases now return REQUEUE; two cases now queue_work().
> 
> If it really can't be simplified, could we at least add some explanatory
> comments inline?
> 
Well, _actually_ this was more an RFC on where would be the point of
having multipath queueing I/Os internally.
This patch remove internal queueing for during pg_init.
I do have a second patch for removing the internal queueing
altogether and drop the entire queue_io stuff.

However, prior to doing so I would like to inquire on the original
design goals. There must have been a reason for implementing the
internal queueing.
If this is just a left-over from the original port to request-based
(for bio-based we _have_ to queue internally as there's no request
queue to be had), fine, we should be removing it.
But the _might_ be some corner cases which require us to do internal
queueing. Junichi should know.

Junichi, could you share some light here?

Cheers,

Hannes
---
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-05 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-01  9:49 [PATCH] dm-mpath: requeue I/O during pg_init Hannes Reinecke
2013-11-05 13:02 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2013-11-05 13:10   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2013-11-05 13:31     ` Alasdair G Kergon
2013-11-05 13:45       ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-11-06  1:28         ` Junichi Nomura
2013-11-05 15:35     ` Alasdair G Kergon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5278EE5F.9070208@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.