From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chen Gang Subject: Re: [Suggestion] are they toolchains' issue? Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:56:45 +0800 Message-ID: <5279AFED.3000600@asianux.com> References: <527396BA.7050906@asianux.com> <52739920.4010905@asianux.com> <20131101194238.GA4060@codeaurora.org> <5274FE49.9000104@asianux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5274FE49.9000104@asianux.com> Sender: linux-hexagon-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: rkuo Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org On 11/02/2013 09:29 PM, Chen Gang wrote: > On 11/02/2013 03:42 AM, rkuo wrote: >> >> Thanks for checking all these. There are newer Hexagon tools available >> here: >> >> https://sourcery.mentor.com/GNUToolchain/release2568?cmpid=7108 >> >> You might want to try those out. The tool prefix is hexagon-linux-, but >> aside from that, a v4 defconfig on 3.12-rc7 compiled for me. >> > > Thank you for your information. > I finish building the new version of gcc and binutils for kernel. And now it can continue -- no related issues which mentioned originally (should be fixed in this new version). >> 'allmodconfig' does not appear to compile due to DMA related issues... >> >> Anyways, would you mind giving the newer tools a try? >> >> > > I will/should try. try to let our hexagon pass 'allmodconfig' within > this month (2013-11-30). > I am continuing, hope we can finish within this month. :-) Thanks. -- Chen Gang