From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:39525 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752017Ab3KFTJX (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:09:23 -0500 Message-ID: <527A93DF.80006@candelatech.com> (sfid-20131106_200926_348428_B56FA24E) Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:09:19 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Crash related to scanning in 'ath' tree (3.12.0-rc5 + minor patches) References: <527A9124.5000306@candelatech.com> (sfid-20131106_195744_890692_15B02E5D) <1383764624.14307.46.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1383764624.14307.46.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/06/2013 11:03 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 10:57 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: >> This is from the 'ath' tree, which is 3.12.0-rc5. There are just a few printk patches >> to mac80211, and some moderate amount of patches to ath10k. I left the ath10k logs in >> this crash in case it provides some clue, but I think it may not be an ath10k problem >> as I have seen what I think is the same crash a few times before in 3.11+ with ath9k. > > You couldn't have seen the same crash with ath9k - it's in > ieee80211_prep_hw_scan() which doesn't get called in that case. Ok, you are right..the old one was a bit different. See my email titled: iee80211_scan_work crash in 3.11.0+ kernel. from 9/12/2013. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com