[U-Boot] [PATCH 09/14] ARM: AM43xx: mux: Update mux data

[Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>]

On Wednesday 06 November 2013 10:11 PM, Vaibhav Bedia wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 06 November 2013 06:13 PM, Vaibhav Bedia wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com> wrote:
>>>> Updating the mux data for UART, and adding data for i2c0 and mmc.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/mux_am43xx.h |    4 +++-
>>>>  board/ti/am43xx/mux.c                         |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/mux_am43xx.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/mux_am43xx.h
>>>> index 0206912..e95efdd 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/mux_am43xx.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/mux_am43xx.h
>>>> @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@
>>>>         __raw_writel(value, (CTRL_BASE + offset));
>>>>
>>>>  /* PAD Control Fields */
>>>> -#define SLEWCTRL       (0x1 << 19)
>>>> +#define DSPULLUDEN     (0x1 << 27) /* DS0 mode Pull-Up/Down enable */
>>>> +#define DSPULLUDDIS    (0x0 << 27) /* DS0 mode Pull-Up/Down Disable */
>>>> +#define SLEWCTRL       (0x1 << 19) /* Slow slew rate selection */
>>>>  #define RXACTIVE       (0x1 << 18)
>>>>  #define PULLDOWN_EN    (0x0 << 17) /* Pull Down Selection */
>>>>  #define PULLUP_EN      (0x1 << 17) /* Pull Up Selection */
>>>> diff --git a/board/ti/am43xx/mux.c b/board/ti/am43xx/mux.c
>>>> index 700e9a7..818a046 100644
>>>> --- a/board/ti/am43xx/mux.c
>>>> +++ b/board/ti/am43xx/mux.c
>>>> @@ -12,8 +12,26 @@
>>>>  #include "board.h"
>>>>
>>>>  static struct module_pin_mux uart0_pin_mux[] = {
>>>> -       {OFFSET(uart0_rxd), (MODE(0) | RXACTIVE)},      /* UART0_RXD */
>>>> -       {OFFSET(uart0_txd), (MODE(0))},                 /* UART0_TXD */
>>>> +       {OFFSET(uart0_rxd),
>>>> +        (MODE(0) | PULLUP_EN | RXACTIVE | SLEWCTRL | DSPULLUDEN)},
>>>> +       {OFFSET(uart0_txd),
>>>> +        (MODE(0) | PULLUDDIS | PULLUP_EN | SLEWCTRL | DSPULLUDEN)},
>>>> +       {-1},
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct module_pin_mux mmc0_pin_mux[] = {
>>>> +       {OFFSET(mmc0_clk), (MODE(0) | PULLUDDIS | RXACTIVE | DSPULLUDEN)},
>>>> +       {OFFSET(mmc0_cmd), (MODE(0) | PULLUP_EN | RXACTIVE | DSPULLUDEN)},
>>>> +       {OFFSET(mmc0_dat0), (MODE(0) | PULLUP_EN | RXACTIVE | DSPULLUDEN)},
>>>> +       {OFFSET(mmc0_dat1), (MODE(0) | PULLUP_EN | RXACTIVE | DSPULLUDEN)},
>>>> +       {OFFSET(mmc0_dat2), (MODE(0) | PULLUP_EN | RXACTIVE | DSPULLUDEN)},
>>>> +       {OFFSET(mmc0_dat3), (MODE(0) | PULLUP_EN | RXACTIVE | DSPULLUDEN)},
>>>> +       {-1},
>>>
>>> Hmm i don't think updating the DSPULL here is a good idea. Since not
>>> all the pins
>>> are used in U-Boot, this is just partially updating the pulls for the
>>> low power state.
>>> I would suggest leaving this bit for the kernel where things can be
>>> updated without
>>> updating the bootloader.
>> These are the preferred settings given to me.
>> Any way if kernel is updating it overwrites these settings, it shouldn't matter I guess..:)
>>
> It's better to clearly list down what configuration a particular
> entity in the system is
> responsible for. Doing partial updates her just makes issues harder to debug.
Ok, Ill update..

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh
> 
> Regards,
> Vaibhav
>