From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974D76D66B for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id A8E83F81226; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:36:10 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AD1F81225; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:36:09 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <527BC186.5040406@mlbassoc.com> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:36:22 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Eggleton References: <527BAC0F.3090901@mlbassoc.com> <7286154.LbYKCCWHqH@helios> In-Reply-To: <7286154.LbYKCCWHqH@helios> Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org, Ross Burton Subject: Re: Some 'depexp' nits X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:36:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2013-11-07 09:25, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi Gary, > > On Thursday 07 November 2013 08:04:47 Gary Thomas wrote: >> I hope this is the correct list. >> >> I was just using '-u depexp' and noticed a few small things. >> $ bitbake my-qt5-image -u depexp >> This UI is only compatible with the -g option >> >> Perhaps this should be worded more strongly, like this? >> This UI requires the -g option > > Sounds like a good idea yes. > >> Also, after running successfully, I closed the window (using >> the close WM button) and got this: >> $ bitbake my-qt5-image -u depexp -g >> Unable to cleanly stop: No such command >> >> There didn't seem to be any other way to exit the program, so >> at least this should be clean. > > There is now a bug open for the latter issue: > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5445 > >> Are these valid concerns/observations? Would you entertain patches >> for these items? > > Yes, that would be great. Can I send them against the Poky/Yocto tree? Or should it be the separate bitbake tree (which is where?)? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------