From: Hendrik Friedel <hendrik@friedels.name>
To: cwillu <cwillu@cwillu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: btrfsck errors is it save to fix?
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 20:16:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527BE712.40304@friedels.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5279E581.4000700@friedels.name>
Hello again,
can someone please help me on this?
Regards,
Hendrik
Am 06.11.2013 07:45, schrieb Hendrik Friedel:
> Hello,
>
> sorry, I was totally unaware still being on 3.11rc2.
>
> I re-ran btrfsck with the same result:
> ./btrfs-progs/btrfsck /dev/sdc1
> Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc1
> UUID: 989306aa-d291-4752-8477-0baf94f8c42f
> checking extents
> checking free space cache
> checking fs roots
> root 256 inode 9579 errors 100
> root 256 inode 9580 errors 100
> root 256 inode 14258 errors 100
> root 256 inode 14259 errors 100
> root 4444 inode 9579 errors 100
> root 4444 inode 9580 errors 100
> root 4444 inode 14258 errors 100
> root 4444 inode 14259 errors 100
> found 1992865028914 bytes used err is 1
> total csum bytes: 3207847732
> total tree bytes: 3902865408
> total fs tree bytes: 38875136
> total extent tree bytes: 135864320
> btree space waste bytes: 411665032
> file data blocks allocated: 3426722545664
> referenced 3426000965632
> Btrfs v0.20-rc1-358-g194aa4a
>
>
> Now dmesg and the syslog stay clear of entries relatet to btrfs.
> But I think, that might also be a coincidence: I ran the old Kernel for
> weeks until this error came, whereas I ran this kernel merely 12h.
>
> Now:
> Does it make sense to futher try to find a possible bug, or do we
> suspect it is fixed? If so: How can I help?
>
> And:
> Can I fix these Problems safely with btrfsck?
>
> Regards,
> Hendrik
>
> Am 05.11.2013 03:03, schrieb cwillu:
>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Hendrik Friedel
>> <hendrik@friedels.name> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> the list was quite full with patches, so this might have been hidden.
>>> Here the complete Stack.
>>> Does this help? Is this what you needed?
>>>> [95764.899294] CPU: 1 PID: 21798 Comm: umount Tainted: GF CIO
>>>> 3.11.0-031100rc2-generic #201307211535
>>
>> Can you reproduce the problem under the released 3.11 or 3.12? An
>> -rc2 is still pretty early in the release cycle, and I wouldn't be at
>> all surprised if it was a bug added and fixed in a later rc.
>>
>
>
--
Hendrik Friedel
Auf dem Brink 12
28844 Weyhe
Mobil 0178 1874363
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-07 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-01 22:29 btrfsck errors is it save to fix? Hendrik Friedel
2013-11-02 8:12 ` cwillu
2013-11-02 8:58 ` Hendrik Friedel
2013-11-04 21:14 ` Hendrik Friedel
2013-11-05 2:03 ` cwillu
2013-11-06 6:45 ` Hendrik Friedel
2013-11-07 19:16 ` Hendrik Friedel [this message]
2013-11-08 10:09 ` Duncan
2013-11-09 8:33 ` Hendrik Friedel
2013-11-11 19:06 ` Hendrik Friedel
2013-11-11 23:58 ` Kai Krakow
2013-11-12 7:32 ` Duncan
2013-11-12 19:37 ` Kai Krakow
2013-11-13 12:20 ` Duncan
2013-11-13 12:24 ` Duncan
2013-11-16 12:32 ` Hendrik Friedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527BE712.40304@friedels.name \
--to=hendrik@friedels.name \
--cc=cwillu@cwillu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.