From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44251) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeWLL-0007i4-Cz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:38:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeWLF-000299-IT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:38:19 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22e]:39909) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeWLF-00028o-Bp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:38:13 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id un15so1127654pbc.33 for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:38:11 -0800 (PST) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <527BFA2A.7040301@twiddle.net> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 06:38:02 +1000 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1383786324-18415-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <1383786324-18415-62-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-1.8 61/61] target-i386: Deconstruct thecpu_T arrayy List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 11/07/2013 08:53 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: > > rth@twiddle.net writes: > >> All references to cpu_T are done with a constant index. It aids >> readability to decompose the array into two scalar variables. > > > I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the readability argument but does > this make any difference to the eventual code generated? > None at all. r~