From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DBD6AE37 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 12:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 8C839F8123C; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 05:28:08 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F001F8123A; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 05:28:06 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <527CD8E4.4000202@mlbassoc.com> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 05:28:20 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Larson References: <527BAC0F.3090901@mlbassoc.com> <7286154.LbYKCCWHqH@helios> <527BC186.5040406@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: Paul Eggleton , "bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org" , Ross Burton Subject: Re: Some 'depexp' nits X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:28:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2013-11-07 09:46, Chris Larson wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Gary Thomas > wrote: > > On 2013-11-07 09:25, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > Hi Gary, > > On Thursday 07 November 2013 08:04:47 Gary Thomas wrote: > > I hope this is the correct list. > > I was just using '-u depexp' and noticed a few small things. > $ bitbake my-qt5-image -u depexp > This UI is only compatible with the -g option > > Perhaps this should be worded more strongly, like this? > This UI requires the -g option > > > Sounds like a good idea yes. > > Also, after running successfully, I closed the window (using > the close WM button) and got this: > $ bitbake my-qt5-image -u depexp -g > Unable to cleanly stop: No such command > > There didn't seem to be any other way to exit the program, so > at least this should be clean. > > > There is now a bug open for the latter issue: > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.__org/show_bug.cgi?id=5445 > > Are these valid concerns/observations? Would you entertain patches > for these items? > > > Yes, that would be great. > > > Can I send them against the Poky/Yocto tree? Or should it be the > separate bitbake tree (which is where?)? > > > http://git.openembedded.org/, mirrored at https://github.com/openembedded/. Submit the patches against the separate bitbake repo to the bitbake-devel list. I sent a patch, but I never received it from the list although I can find it in the list archives. This made me think I had messed up somehow, so I ended up sending it three times :-( Did you (or anyone) actually see it? Did I do something wrong? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------