From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeoCV-0002Pu-Jq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:42:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeoCO-0000hZ-9c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:42:23 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51327 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeoCO-0000hS-0c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:42:16 -0500 Message-ID: <527D0652.9020805@suse.de> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:42:10 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1383511723-11228-1-git-send-email-marcel.a@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec: fix regression by making system-memory region UINT64_MAX size List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jordan Justen , Laszlo Ersek Cc: Peter Maydell , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jan Kiszka , Marcel Apfelbaum , qemu-devel , Anthony Liguori , Paolo Bonzini , rth@twiddle.net Am 07.11.2013 21:27, schrieb Jordan Justen: > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Marcel Apfelbaum = wrote: >> The commit: >> >> Commit: a53ae8e934cd54686875b5bcfc2f434244ee55d6 >> Author: Marcel Apfelbaum >> Date: Mon Sep 16 11:21:16 2013 +0300 >> >> hw/pci: partially handle pci master abort >> >> introduced a regression on make check: >=20 > Laszlo pointed out that my OVMF flash support series was not working > with QEMU master. It was working with QEMU 1.6.0. I then bisected the > issue to this commit. It seems this commit regresses -pflash support > for both KVM and non-KVM modes. >=20 > Can you reproduce the issue this with command? > x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -pflash pc-bios/bios.bin > (with or without adding -enable-kvm) Jordan or Laszlo, Can either of you please add a small test case to i440fx-test using -pflash and doing a read in the PCI hole (or wherever exactly) so that we can avoid regressing yet again? :) Regards, Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg