Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/10] bonding: rebuild the lock use for bond_alb_monitor()

[Ding Tianhong <dthxman@gmail.com>]

于 2013/11/9 0:07, Nikolay Aleksandrov 写道:
> On 11/08/2013 03:07 AM, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> The bond_alb_monitor use bond lock to protect the bond slave list,
>> it is no effect here, we need to use RTNL or RCU to replace bond lock,
>> the bond_alb_monitor will called 10 times one second, RTNL may loss
>> performance here, so the bond lock replace with RCU to protect the
>> bond slave list, also the RTNL is preserved, the logic of the monitor
>> did not changed.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
>> Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 21 +++++++++------------
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> index 1fae915..ffdb91b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ static void rlb_rebalance(struct bonding *bond)
>>   	for (; hash_index != RLB_NULL_INDEX;
>>   	     hash_index = client_info->used_next) {
>>   		client_info = &(bond_info->rx_hashtbl[hash_index]);
>> -		assigned_slave = rlb_next_rx_slave(bond);
>> +		assigned_slave = __rlb_next_rx_slave(bond);
>>   		if (assigned_slave && (client_info->slave != assigned_slave)) {
>>   			client_info->slave = assigned_slave;
>>   			client_info->ntt = 1;
>> @@ -1495,9 +1495,10 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
>>   	struct list_head *iter;
>>   	struct slave *slave;
>>   
>> -	read_lock(&bond->lock);
>> +	rcu_read_lock();
>>   
>> -	if (!bond_has_slaves(bond)) {
>> +	if (!bond_has_slaves_rcu(bond)) {
>> +		rcu_read_unlock();
>>   		bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter = 0;
>>   		bond_info->lp_counter = 0;
>>   		goto re_arm;
> If I'm not mistaken there's one more bond_for_each_slave() inside this function
> which should be converted to RCU.

But I really could not find any place should converted to RCU,

__rlb_next_rx_slave() is in RCU yet.

pls remind me if I miss something.

Regards
Ding


>> @@ -1528,7 +1529,7 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
>>   
>>   		read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
>>   
>> -		bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
>> +		bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
>>   			tlb_clear_slave(bond, slave, 1);
>>   			if (slave == bond->curr_active_slave) {
>>   				SLAVE_TLB_INFO(slave).load =
>> @@ -1552,11 +1553,9 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
>>   			 * dev_set_promiscuity requires rtnl and
>>   			 * nothing else.  Avoid race with bond_close.
>>   			 */
>> -			read_unlock(&bond->lock);
>> -			if (!rtnl_trylock()) {
>> -				read_lock(&bond->lock);
>> +			rcu_read_unlock();
>> +			if (!rtnl_trylock())
>>   				goto re_arm;
>> -			}
>>   
>>   			bond_info->rlb_promisc_timeout_counter = 0;
>>   
>> @@ -1568,7 +1567,7 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
>>   			bond_info->primary_is_promisc = 0;
>>   
>>   			rtnl_unlock();
>> -			read_lock(&bond->lock);
>> +			rcu_read_lock();
>>   		}
>>   
>>   		if (bond_info->rlb_rebalance) {
>> @@ -1590,11 +1589,9 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
>>   			}
>>   		}
>>   	}
>> -
>> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>>   re_arm:
>>   	queue_delayed_work(bond->wq, &bond->alb_work, alb_delta_in_ticks);
>> -
>> -	read_unlock(&bond->lock);
>>   }
>>   
>>   /* assumption: called before the slave is attached to the bond
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>