All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nested VMX: don't ignore mapping errors
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:13:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5280BBCC.1070209@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5280C85E0200007800101BC9@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On 11/11/13 11:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Rather than ignoring failures to map the virtual VMCS as well as MSR or
> I/O port bitmaps, convert those into failures of the respective
> instructions (avoiding to dereference NULL pointers). Ultimately such
> failures should be handled transparently (by using transient mappings
> when they actually need to be accessed, just like nested SVM does).
>
> Once at it, also eliminate a pointless (and incomplete) result check:
> Non-global (i.e. non-permanent) map operations can't fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Looks better.  It might be worth leaving a comment around
_map_{io,msr}_bitmap() indicating that support for shared/paged pages is
currently TODO.

I also think the commit message should indicate that shared/paged pages
wont work.  This fundamentally means that nested virt is currently
mutually exclusive with sharing/paging.

Either way, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

> ---
> v2: Remove the change to nvmx_handle_vmclear() -
>     hvm_map_guest_frame_*() can return NULL for reasons other than
>     map_domain_page_global() doing so (pointed out by Andrew Cooper).
>     That leaves the function broken though (it ought to handle the
>     shared/paged out cases in an appropriate way).
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
> @@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ static void __clear_current_vvmcs(struct
>          __vmpclear(virt_to_maddr(nvcpu->nv_n2vmcx));
>  }
>  
> -static void __map_msr_bitmap(struct vcpu *v)
> +static bool_t __must_check _map_msr_bitmap(struct vcpu *v)
>  {
>      struct nestedvmx *nvmx = &vcpu_2_nvmx(v);
>      unsigned long gpa;
> @@ -756,9 +756,11 @@ static void __map_msr_bitmap(struct vcpu
>          hvm_unmap_guest_frame(nvmx->msrbitmap, 1);
>      gpa = __get_vvmcs(vcpu_nestedhvm(v).nv_vvmcx, MSR_BITMAP);
>      nvmx->msrbitmap = hvm_map_guest_frame_ro(gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT, 1);
> +
> +    return nvmx->msrbitmap != NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static void __map_io_bitmap(struct vcpu *v, u64 vmcs_reg)
> +static bool_t __must_check _map_io_bitmap(struct vcpu *v, u64 vmcs_reg)
>  {
>      struct nestedvmx *nvmx = &vcpu_2_nvmx(v);
>      unsigned long gpa;
> @@ -769,12 +771,14 @@ static void __map_io_bitmap(struct vcpu 
>          hvm_unmap_guest_frame(nvmx->iobitmap[index], 1);
>      gpa = __get_vvmcs(vcpu_nestedhvm(v).nv_vvmcx, vmcs_reg);
>      nvmx->iobitmap[index] = hvm_map_guest_frame_ro(gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT, 1);
> +
> +    return nvmx->iobitmap[index] != NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void map_io_bitmap_all(struct vcpu *v)
> +static inline bool_t __must_check map_io_bitmap_all(struct vcpu *v)
>  {
> -   __map_io_bitmap (v, IO_BITMAP_A);
> -   __map_io_bitmap (v, IO_BITMAP_B);
> +   return _map_io_bitmap(v, IO_BITMAP_A) &&
> +          _map_io_bitmap(v, IO_BITMAP_B);
>  }
>  
>  static void nvmx_purge_vvmcs(struct vcpu *v)
> @@ -1610,9 +1614,15 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmptrld(struct cpu_user_
>      if ( nvcpu->nv_vvmcxaddr == VMCX_EADDR )
>      {
>          nvcpu->nv_vvmcx = hvm_map_guest_frame_rw(gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT, 1);
> -        nvcpu->nv_vvmcxaddr = gpa;
> -        map_io_bitmap_all (v);
> -        __map_msr_bitmap(v);
> +        if ( nvcpu->nv_vvmcx )
> +            nvcpu->nv_vvmcxaddr = gpa;
> +        if ( !nvcpu->nv_vvmcx ||
> +             !map_io_bitmap_all(v) ||
> +             !_map_msr_bitmap(v) )
> +        {
> +            vmreturn(regs, VMFAIL_VALID);
> +            goto out;
> +        }
>      }
>  
>      if ( cpu_has_vmx_vmcs_shadowing )
> @@ -1724,6 +1734,7 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmwrite(struct cpu_user_
>      struct nestedvcpu *nvcpu = &vcpu_nestedhvm(v);
>      unsigned long operand; 
>      u64 vmcs_encoding;
> +    bool_t okay = 1;
>  
>      if ( decode_vmx_inst(regs, &decode, &operand, 0)
>               != X86EMUL_OKAY )
> @@ -1732,16 +1743,21 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmwrite(struct cpu_user_
>      vmcs_encoding = reg_read(regs, decode.reg2);
>      __set_vvmcs(nvcpu->nv_vvmcx, vmcs_encoding, operand);
>  
> -    if ( vmcs_encoding == IO_BITMAP_A || vmcs_encoding == IO_BITMAP_A_HIGH )
> -        __map_io_bitmap (v, IO_BITMAP_A);
> -    else if ( vmcs_encoding == IO_BITMAP_B || 
> -              vmcs_encoding == IO_BITMAP_B_HIGH )
> -        __map_io_bitmap (v, IO_BITMAP_B);
> +    switch ( vmcs_encoding )
> +    {
> +    case IO_BITMAP_A: case IO_BITMAP_A_HIGH:
> +        okay = _map_io_bitmap(v, IO_BITMAP_A);
> +        break;
> +    case IO_BITMAP_B: case IO_BITMAP_B_HIGH:
> +        okay = _map_io_bitmap(v, IO_BITMAP_B);
> +        break;
> +    case MSR_BITMAP: case MSR_BITMAP_HIGH:
> +        okay = _map_msr_bitmap(v);
> +        break;
> +    }
>  
> -    if ( vmcs_encoding == MSR_BITMAP || vmcs_encoding == MSR_BITMAP_HIGH )
> -        __map_msr_bitmap(v);
> +    vmreturn(regs, okay ? VMSUCCEED : VMFAIL_VALID);
>  
> -    vmreturn(regs, VMSUCCEED);
>      return X86EMUL_OKAY;
>  }
>  
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-11 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-11  8:27 [PATCH] nested VMX: don't ignore mapping errors Jan Beulich
2013-11-11 10:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-11-11 10:45   ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-11 11:06   ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Beulich
2013-11-11 11:13     ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-11-15 10:57     ` Ping: " Jan Beulich
2013-11-18  1:57     ` Dong, Eddie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5280BBCC.1070209@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.