From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vfun9-0001UM-5Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:56:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vfun2-00073b-U5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:56:47 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vfun2-00073V-Lu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:56:40 -0500 Message-ID: <52810C44.3050106@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:56:36 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5280F6DC.6080301@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] xsave instruction not passed through correctly on AMD hardware List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Owen Tuz Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 11/11/2013 16:43, Owen Tuz ha scritto: > Thanks, Paolo. We will test and let you know. > I'm not familiar with LWP (some reading to do there) - are there any > plans to support this in future, or is this just something that we're > not interested in emulating? Given Linux does not support LWP, and AMD is not really trying to compete with Intel anymore, it is quite unlikely that KVM will support LWP in the future. Paolo