All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] audit needed for signal handlers
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:22:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52811265.5070803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_3e5RK2Dz2D6x3mGnE+MZ6BohLVtkiUJ+_ktz5dASNcg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1104 bytes --]

On 11/11/2013 10:13 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 11 November 2013 17:05, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> That said, aren't all signals in QEMU (except SIG_IPI) caught with
>> signalfd and the handlers run synchronously in the iothread?
> 
> Eric specifically points out one which is not.
> (I'm pretty sure that 'reinstall signal handler at
> end of signal handler' is ancient voodoo that we don't
> want either, incidentally.)

Reinstalling the signal handler is voodoo needed only for systems where
SA_RESETHAND is the default behavior of signal() (POSIX says that the
older signal() is implementation-defined whether it behaves like
SA_RESETHAND|SA_NODEFER [SysV] or SA_RESTART [BSD] - so it is already
mandatory to use sigaction() if you don't want to be bitten by the
difference in semantics; but if you can assume working sigaction(), then
don't use signal() or SA_RESETHAND in the first place, and you don't
need the reinstall voodoo in your handlers).

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 621 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-11 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-11 16:50 [Qemu-devel] audit needed for signal handlers Eric Blake
2013-11-11 16:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-11-11 17:03   ` Eric Blake
2013-11-11 17:05   ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-11 17:08     ` Eric Blake
2013-11-11 17:11       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-11 17:13     ` Peter Maydell
2013-11-11 17:22       ` Eric Blake [this message]
2013-11-11 17:47       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-12  8:18         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-11-12 12:07         ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-11-11 17:11   ` Peter Maydell
2013-11-11 18:03 ` Max Filippov
2013-11-12 12:24   ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52811265.5070803@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.