From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] fb: reorder the lock sequence to fix potential dead lock
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 01:06:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52817F25.2090808@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5280E2BF.7040602@ti.com>
Hi Tomi,
On 11/11/2013 09:59 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 2013-11-05 12:00, Gu Zheng wrote:
>> Following commits:
>> 50e244cc79 fb: rework locking to fix lock ordering on takeover
>> e93a9a8687 fb: Yet another band-aid for fixing lockdep mess
>> 054430e773 fbcon: fix locking harder
>> reworked locking to fix related lock ordering on takeover, and introduced console_lock
>> into fbmem, but it seems that the new lock sequence(fb_info->lock ---> console_lock)
>> is against with the one in console_callback(console_lock ---> fb_info->lock), and leads to
>> a potential dead lock as following:
>
> <snip>
>
>> so we reorder the lock sequence the same as it in console_callback() to
>> avoid this issue. And following Tomi's suggestion, fix these similar
>> issues all in fb subsystem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/video/fbmem.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> drivers/video/fbsysfs.c | 19 ++++++++++----
>> drivers/video/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.c | 10 ++++---
>> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> I'll apply this for 3.13. It's a bit difficult to verify if the locking
> is now correct, but looks fine to me. And we can revert this easily if
> things break badly.
Thanks very munch.:)
Regards,
Gu
>
> Tomi
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] fb: reorder the lock sequence to fix potential dead lock
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:06:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52817F25.2090808@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5280E2BF.7040602@ti.com>
Hi Tomi,
On 11/11/2013 09:59 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 2013-11-05 12:00, Gu Zheng wrote:
>> Following commits:
>> 50e244cc79 fb: rework locking to fix lock ordering on takeover
>> e93a9a8687 fb: Yet another band-aid for fixing lockdep mess
>> 054430e773 fbcon: fix locking harder
>> reworked locking to fix related lock ordering on takeover, and introduced console_lock
>> into fbmem, but it seems that the new lock sequence(fb_info->lock ---> console_lock)
>> is against with the one in console_callback(console_lock ---> fb_info->lock), and leads to
>> a potential dead lock as following:
>
> <snip>
>
>> so we reorder the lock sequence the same as it in console_callback() to
>> avoid this issue. And following Tomi's suggestion, fix these similar
>> issues all in fb subsystem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/video/fbmem.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> drivers/video/fbsysfs.c | 19 ++++++++++----
>> drivers/video/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.c | 10 ++++---
>> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> I'll apply this for 3.13. It's a bit difficult to verify if the locking
> is now correct, but looks fine to me. And we can revert this easily if
> things break badly.
Thanks very munch.:)
Regards,
Gu
>
> Tomi
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 10:00 [RESEND PATCH 1/2] fb: reorder the lock sequence to fix potential dead lock Gu Zheng
2013-11-05 10:00 ` Gu Zheng
2013-11-11 13:59 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-11-11 13:59 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-11-12 1:06 ` Gu Zheng [this message]
2013-11-12 1:06 ` Gu Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52817F25.2090808@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.