From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm/arm64: KVM: MMIO support for BE guest
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:07:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5281FDE9.4070106@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5281FD0A.7020703@arm.com>
Il 12/11/2013 11:03, Marc Zyngier ha scritto:
>> >
>> > I'd cast my vote (if I have one) towards the sharing a tree method. For
>> > those of us scrambling to get caught up with kvmarm, a reduction in the
>> > number of trees and branches we need to track would be a welcome change.
> Not sure what the benefit would be. We'd go from two trees with
> respectively x and y branches, to a single tree with x+y branches.
>
> Christoffer and I tend to work on separate topics, we track what the
> other does, and we make sure we don't overlap. And if we do, we shove
> the related patches in the same branch. Overall, whether or not we
> switch to co-maintainership, I don't expect our workflow to change much.
Yes, I think your workflow is fine as is.
Andrew, with two co-maintainers Christoffer and Marc would probably send
more frequent pull requests. You're probably better off sending them
patches based on kvm/next directly.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-08 10:07 [GIT PULL] KVM/arm64 fixes for 3.13 Marc Zyngier
2013-11-08 10:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: KVM: Yield CPU when vcpu executes a WFE Marc Zyngier
2013-11-08 10:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm/arm64: KVM: MMIO support for BE guest Marc Zyngier
2013-11-11 11:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-11 14:56 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-11 15:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-11 15:49 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-11 17:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-11 18:03 ` Peter Maydell
2013-11-11 18:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-11 18:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-11 18:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-11 18:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-12 9:41 ` Andrew Jones
2013-11-12 10:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-12 10:07 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-11-12 16:30 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-11 18:39 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-08 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm/arm64: KVM: PSCI: propagate caller endianness to the incoming vcpu Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5281FDE9.4070106@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.