From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
"xen.org" <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@calxeda.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Xen osstest on Calxeda midway progress (Was: Re: [xen-unstable test] 21486: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:58:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52823405.7050700@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383731526.26213.25.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
On 11/06/2013 09:52 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 06:52 +0000, xen.org wrote:
>
>> flight 21486 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/21486/
> [...]
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl 5 xen-boot fail never pass
>
> Switching the ARM tests over to Linux 3.12 means we now get much further
> and run into:
>
> (from http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/21486/test-armhf-armhf-xl/serial-marilith-n5.txt)
>
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.136164] sata_highbank gpio_request 0 failed: -517
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.140696] highbank-ahci ffe08000.sata: AHCI 0001.0300 32 slots 5 ports 3 Gbps 0x1f impl platform mode
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.149152] highbank-ahci ffe08000.sata: flags: 64bit ncq sntf stag pm led clo only pmp pio slum part ccc apst
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.159435] scsi0 : sata_highbank
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.162451] scsi1 : sata_highbank
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.165490] scsi2 : sata_highbank
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.168516] scsi3 : sata_highbank
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.171566] scsi4 : sata_highbank
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.174606] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0xffe08000-0xffe17fff] port 0x100 irq 115
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.181779] ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0xffe08000-0xffe17fff] port 0x180 irq 115
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.189060] ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0xffe08000-0xffe17fff] port 0x200 irq 115
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.196323] ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0xffe08000-0xffe17fff] port 0x280 irq 115
> [...]
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.203581] ata5: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0xffe08000-0xffe17fff] port 0x300 irq 115
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:04 2013][ 10.353721] ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed)
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:14 2013][ 19.362722] ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed)
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:49 2013][ 50.871721] ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed)
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:49 2013][ 50.876019] ata1: limiting SATA link speed to 1.5 Gbps
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:54 2013][ 55.389720] ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed)
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:54 2013][ 55.394018] ata1: reset failed, giving up
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:55 2013][ 55.704724] ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:55 2013][ 56.019724] ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:55 2013][ 56.334723] ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:56 2013][ 56.649722] ata5: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> [...]
>> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:56 2013]Begin: Mounting root file system ... Begin: Running /scripts/local-top ... Volume group "marilith-n5" not found
> ... fail to find root.
>
Hi,
Sorry I'm a bit late to answer.
> Has anyone seen this before, is it a known 3.12 on Midway issue perhaps?
This is due to an interrupt issue. If you apply my non-yet-reworking
interrupts patch series, all theses errors will disappear.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-06 6:52 [xen-unstable test] 21486: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED xen.org
2013-11-06 9:52 ` Xen osstest on Calxeda midway progress (Was: Re: [xen-unstable test] 21486: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED) Ian Campbell
2013-11-06 11:14 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-06 11:19 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-06 19:40 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-06 19:57 ` Andre Przywara
2013-11-07 11:14 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-11 18:42 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-12 9:53 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 12:25 ` Physical memory start contraints in the Linux kernel (Was: Re: Xen osstest on Calxeda midway progress (Was: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 21486: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED)) Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-12 12:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-12 13:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-12 13:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-12 14:38 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 14:38 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 14:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-12 14:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-12 14:52 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 14:52 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 15:24 ` Michal Simek
2013-11-12 15:24 ` Michal Simek
2013-11-12 15:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-12 15:39 ` Physical memory start contraints in the Linux kernel (Was: Re: Xen osstest on Calxeda midway progress (Was: " Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-12 15:40 ` Physical memory start contraints in the Linux kernel (Was: Re: Xen osstest on Calxeda midway progress (Was: Re: [Xen-devel] " Michal Simek
2013-11-12 15:40 ` Physical memory start contraints in the Linux kernel (Was: Re: Xen osstest on Calxeda midway progress (Was: " Michal Simek
2013-11-12 13:37 ` Physical memory start contraints in the Linux kernel (Was: Re: Xen osstest on Calxeda midway progress (Was: Re: [Xen-devel] " Arnd Bergmann
2013-11-12 13:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-11-12 14:35 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-12 14:35 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-12 14:40 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 14:40 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 18:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-11-12 18:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-11-12 18:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-12 18:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-12 20:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-11-12 20:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-11-13 10:50 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-13 10:50 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-13 17:33 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-13 17:33 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-13 19:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-11-13 19:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-11-14 15:24 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-14 15:24 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-12 14:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-12 14:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-12 14:52 ` [Xen-devel] Physical memory start contraints in the Linux kernel (Was: Re: Xen osstest on Calxeda midway progress (Was: " Julien Grall
2013-11-12 14:52 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-12 14:57 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 14:57 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 15:24 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-12 15:24 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-12 15:32 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 15:32 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-13 12:57 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-13 12:57 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-12 15:00 ` Physical memory start contraints in the Linux kernel (Was: Re: Xen osstest on Calxeda midway progress (Was: Re: [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-12 15:00 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-12 15:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-12 15:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-12 13:58 ` Julien Grall [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52823405.7050700@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@calxeda.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.