From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] devargs: remove deprecated functions Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 19:10:49 +0200 Message-ID: <5284368.tvJgfgGlPD@xps> References: <20180907222727.20521-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20180928162144.1972-2-thomas@monjalon.net> <71b916a0-e3ae-3c3a-023b-77ec283a821d@solarflare.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, gaetan.rivet@6wind.com, ophirmu@mellanox.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, ktraynor@redhat.com To: Andrew Rybchenko Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F145F25 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:10:55 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <71b916a0-e3ae-3c3a-023b-77ec283a821d@solarflare.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 01/10/2018 13:24, Andrew Rybchenko: > On 9/28/18 7:21 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > rte_eal_parse_devargs_str() does not support parsing the bus name > > at the start of devargs. So it has been renamed and deprecated. > > > > rte_eal_devargs_add(), rte_eal_devargs_type_count() and > > rte_eal_devargs_dump() were declared deprecated and had their > > implementation body renamed. > > > > All these functions were deprecated in release 18.05. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko > > I would say that it is more fair to say that changes related to > rte_eal_devargs_add(), rte_eal_devargs_type_count() and > rte_eal_devargs_dump() fixes b65ecf19 since the changeset > simply removes these functions. May be the ideal solution > is to add changeset which adds these deprecated functions > and simply calls replacement and remove in the next changeset. > But it is too many efforts for nothing, so good to go as is. Yes, not worth the effort. > Should it be mentioned in release notes (API removal)? Yes, you're right, will add a note in v4. Thanks