From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Cc: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: btrfsRe: Does btrfs "raid1" actually provide any resilience?
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 22:31:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5285411F.5020805@libero.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A0F65AC7-D109-47AB-AA1B-9156A33E86A5@colorremedies.com>
On 2013-11-14 22:22, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it> wrote:
>>
>> Instead if I use the btrfs-progs c652e4efb8e2dd7... I got
>>
>> [snip]
>
>> Data+Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=28.00KB
>>
>> Note the absence of any RAID1 profile.
>
> What happens if the devices are large enough to avoid mandatory block group mixing? Try 100GB for each device. Is the problem reproducible?
It seems related to the mixing (see my other email). Even looking at the
code and doing some tests seems to confirm that.
>
> Chris Murphy--
Goffredo
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-14 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-14 11:02 Does btrfs "raid1" actually provide any resilience? Lutz Vieweg
2013-11-14 17:18 ` George Mitchell
2013-11-14 17:35 ` Lutz Vieweg
2013-11-14 19:59 ` Kyle Gates
2013-11-15 1:58 ` George Mitchell
2013-11-14 18:22 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-11-14 20:47 ` BUG: btrfsRe: " Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-11-14 21:21 ` Mixed and raid [was Re: BUG: btrfsRe: Does btrfs "raid1" actually provide any resilience?] Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-11-15 4:44 ` Anand Jain
2013-11-15 10:35 ` Lutz Vieweg
2013-11-15 10:36 ` Lutz Vieweg
2013-11-15 7:12 ` Duncan
2013-11-15 7:30 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-11-15 9:37 ` Duncan
2013-11-14 21:22 ` BUG: btrfsRe: Does btrfs "raid1" actually provide any resilience? Chris Murphy
2013-11-14 21:31 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5285411F.5020805@libero.it \
--to=kreijack@libero.it \
--cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.