From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from qproxy.gmail.com (qproxy.gmail.com [72.14.204.204]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4F968110 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:57:06 +1000 (EST) Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k13so75729qbf for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <528646bc05091023575d640a6e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:57:05 -0600 From: Grant Likely To: linuxppc-embedded In-Reply-To: <528646bc0509100033167dae7f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <528646bc0509100033167dae7f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Port Virtex-II Pro code to use the platform bus Reply-To: glikely@gmail.com List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , BTW, I'll be out of town and computer-free until Sept. 19, so I won't answer any comments until then. Cheers, g. On 9/10/05, Grant Likely wrote: > Here is my work to date to bring the V2Pro port over to the platform > bus. I don't expect these to be accepted as-is, but I'm looking for > comments before I get it polished. >=20 > Should apply cleanly against 2.6.13 (but may require the TLB patch first) > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=3D2058 >=20 > Patch 1: changes from the ML300 perspective. I temporarly don't have > access to an ML300 so this is untested (but it compiles). Could > somebody please test this for me? >=20 > Patch 2: example patch for another V2PRO based board. This isn't > really acceptable for mainline because it's not based on a reference > or published FPGA design, but it shows the work required to bring up > another board. It also shines some light on what code should be > common between all V2Pro ports (which I'm working on). This one runs > on a 2VP4-FG456 eval board (pls ignore all the references to 2VP30). >