From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: Do not include padding in TCP GRO checksum
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 10:24:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528909E4.1000100@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131117031710.GA18254@gondor.apana.org.au>
On 11/16/2013 07:17 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 09:02:34AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> That being the case though, why don't we set the flush flag on detecting
>> a bad checksum and hand it off to tcp_gro_receive instead of returning
>> NULL? It seems like it would be in our interest to flush the flow and
>> then report the bad checksum instead of keeping the flow and handing off
>> the bad checksum to the stack.
> Because if the TCP checksum is wrong then it may belong to a
> different flow.
>
> Cheers,
It seems like it would be much more likely that a checksum error
occuring with a padded frame would corrupt the flow identifying data
then one that isn't padded.
I suppose it doesn't really matter though since checksum errors are
probably not going to be all that common of a case to deal with anyway.
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-17 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-15 23:00 [PATCH v3] net: Do not include padding in TCP GRO checksum Alexander Duyck
2013-11-16 0:47 ` Herbert Xu
2013-11-16 1:34 ` David Miller
2013-11-16 1:43 ` Herbert Xu
2013-11-16 2:11 ` David Miller
2013-11-16 1:53 ` Herbert Xu
2013-11-16 4:10 ` Alexander Duyck
2013-11-16 6:46 ` Herbert Xu
2013-11-16 7:23 ` Herbert Xu
2013-11-16 17:02 ` Alexander Duyck
2013-11-17 3:17 ` Herbert Xu
2013-11-17 18:24 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2013-11-18 0:03 ` Herbert Xu
2013-11-18 17:43 ` Alexander Duyck
2013-11-21 18:35 ` David Miller
2013-11-22 2:30 ` Herbert Xu
2013-11-22 2:31 ` [1/2] gro: Only verify TCP checksums for candidates Herbert Xu
2013-11-22 5:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-23 22:47 ` David Miller
2013-11-22 2:32 ` [2/2] gro: Clean up tcpX_gro_receive checksum verification Herbert Xu
2013-11-22 5:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-23 22:47 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528909E4.1000100@gmail.com \
--to=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.