From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phillip Susi Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sd: don't bother spinning up disks on resume Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 20:11:56 -0500 Message-ID: <5289695C.1000907@ubuntu.com> References: <527AF287.7020700@ubuntu.com> <927e15641f27b46f206f8ae8110201c8fd77b7e1.1383789225.git.psusi@ubuntu.com> <527BDA11.6060603@interlog.com> <527C0349.5010301@ubuntu.com> <1384626031.3614.7.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <52883CE9.9040102@ubuntu.com> <1384670620.3614.24.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <5288EBA6.3070609@ubuntu.com> <1384733368.2050.18.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]:62364 "EHLO cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751377Ab3KRBL5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Nov 2013 20:11:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1384733368.2050.18.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: dgilbert@interlog.com, todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 11/17/2013 07:09 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > Because you don't damn well listen. Two emails ago I said: > > The error handler is not automatically activated for a not > ready/initializing command required because of multi-path And I replied that that *if* eh is suppressed ( and I'm still not clear on why multipath would do that ), then a flag could be used to pro actively start the drive despite the suppression, like I did with libata. > I don't really understand how I can be clearer. You keep > wittering about the error handler spin up but if the error handler > doesn't activate, the disk is never spun up with your patch. This > is the problem we keep telling you about. You can't make the error > handler always activate because then multi-path would fail. Why does multi-path -> no eh? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSiWlcAAoJEJrBOlT6nu755h4H/AwoDzPc/iNAw/v3h+HGszCx 3AZUJUbabF7XB8NxbfyLG/vvaGEqxatv5fX3y0I6CmWpWBGQYyDL7W6uQIgKjqAt OmUCEEv3PqnytTg7VjyBBif+TMxM35gZvqzFYWU5DOMB9D+QtvfIHmyH4rCMujYl tLJqArxLMBLnLmpSTp0/TTrvjxDThjkCF6vlM0iSe7C8xZsByRcpoIQJlsvTW7YT IWVop4H9iAW4CZhiSQwdf+IiK8Av45RW8i20em+LlaVvbofoBlUOgUrxIIXu7trT cslbwtPQ2N3SsTEd5E43W3bzDO19gzQHJf5wHTiMg3++yPWqP0hMUgU0ci0Y4aI= =DleI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----