From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Kirkwood Subject: Re: Could ceph-deploy handle unknown or custom distribution? (Was: Mourning the demise of mkcephfs) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 19:15:51 +1300 Message-ID: <5289B097.4020509@catalyst.net.nz> References: <5281192D.4090707@bob-the-boat.me.uk> <5282F309.2030104@catalyst.net.nz> <5289AE12.6020102@catalyst.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bertrand.catalyst.net.nz ([202.78.240.40]:35284 "EHLO mail.catalyst.net.nz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750731Ab3KRGPx (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Nov 2013 01:15:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5289AE12.6020102@catalyst.net.nz> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alfredo Deza , "Dave (Bob)" Cc: ceph-devel On 18/11/13 19:05, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Anyway I have attached a log of me getting a system of 2 Archlinux nodes > up. These were KVM guests built identically and ceph (0.72) was compiled > from src and installed. > Blast - forgot to edit the top of the log to reflect the effect of the osd and ceph-disk patches, should say: State: - monitors created and start ok - osd created ok - osd started ok via 'activate' after patching ceph-disk