From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.4 development update: Code freezing point reached
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:50:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528B4280.4090609@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLBxZYH7_CicH2W7b17LbPiKLuScDmYVEf5CQV7ZpPrWCC4ow@mail.gmail.com>
On 18/11/13 19:19, George Dunlap wrote:
> This information will be mirrored on the Xen 4.4 Roadmap wiki page:
> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Roadmap/4.4
>
> (And I actually updated the wiki this time.)
>
> The code "freezing point" is today; which means that starting today
> non-bug fixes need a freeze exception to be included.
>
> Remember our goal for the release:
> 1. A bug-free release
> 2. An awesome release
> 3. An on-time release
>
> Accepting a new feature may make Xen more awesome; but it also
> introduces a risk that it will introduce more bugs. That bug may be
> found before the release (threatening #3), or it may not be found
> until after the release (threatening #1). Each freeze exception
> request will attempt to balance the benefits (how awesome the
> exception is) vs the risks (will it cause the release to slip, or
> worse, cause a bug which goes un-noticed into the final release).
>
> The idea is that today we will be pretty permissive, but that we will
> become progressively more conservative until the first RC, which is
> scheduled for 3 weeks' time (6 December). After that, we will only
> accept bug fixes.
>
> Bug fixes can be checked in without a freeze exception throughout the
> code freeze, unless the maintianer thinks they are particularly high
> risk. In later RC's, we may even begin rejecting bug fixes if the
> broken functionality is small and the risk to other functionality is
> high.
>
> Features which are currently marked "experimental" or do not at the
> moment work at all cannot be broken really; so changes to code only
> used by those features should be able to get a freeze exception
> easily. (Tianocore is something which would probably fall under
> this.)
>
> Features which change or add new interfaces which will need to be
> supported in a backwards-compatible way (for instance, vNUMA) will
> need freeze exceptions to make sure that the interface itself has
> enough time to be considered stable.
>
> These are guidelines and principles to give you an idea where we're
> coming from; if you think there's a good reason why making an
> exception for you will help us achieve goals 1-3 above better than not
> doing so, feel free to make your case.
>
> = Timeline =
>
> Here is our current timeline based on a 6-month release:
>
> * Feature freeze: 18 October 2013
> * Code freezing point: 18 November 2013 <== WE ARE HERE
> * First RC: 6 December 2013
> * Release: 21 January 2014
>
> Last updated: 18 November 2016
>
> == Completed ==
>
> * Event channel scalability (FIFO event channels)
>
> * Non-udev scripts for driver domains (non-Linux driver domains)
>
> * Multi-vector PCI MSI (Hypervisor side)
>
> * Improved Spice support on libxl
> - Added Spice vdagent support
> - Added Spice clipboard sharing support
>
> * PHV domU (experimental only)
>
> * Guest EFI booting (tianocore)
>
> * kexec
>
> * Testing: Xen on ARM
>
> * Update to SeaBIOS 1.7.3.1
>
> * pvgrub2 checked into grub upstream
* Driver domain userspace daemon.
>
> == Resolved since last update ==
>
> * credit scheduler doesn't update other fields when tslice updated from sysctl
>
> == Open ==
>
> * qemu-upstream not freeing pirq
> > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/281498
> status: patches posted; latest patches need testing
>
> * Race in PV shutdown between tool detection and shutdown watch
> > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/282467
> > Nothing to do with ACPI
> status: Patches posted
>
> * Supposed regression from a3513737 ("x86: allow guest to set/clear
> > MSI-X mask bit (try 2)"), as per
> > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-09/msg01589.html.
>
> * qemu-traditional mis-parses host bus 8 as 0
> > http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/bug/15
>
> * xen_platform_pci=0 doesn't work with qemu-xen
> > http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/bug/20
>
> * xl does not support specifying virtual function for passthrough device
> > http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/bug/22
>
> * xl does not handle migrate interruption gracefully
> > If you start a localhost migrate, and press "Ctrl-C" in the middle,
> > you get two hung domains
>
> * libxl / xl does not handle failure of remote qemu gracefully
> > Easiest way to reproduce:
> > - set "vncunused=0" and do a local migrate
> > - The "remote" qemu will fail because the vnc port is in use
> > The failure isn't the problem, but everything being stuck afterwards is
>
> * HPET interrupt stack overflow (when using hpet_broadcast mode and MSI
> capable HPETs)
> owner: andyh@citrix
> status: patches posted, undergoing review iteration.
>
> == Backlog ==
>
> === Testing coverage ===
>
> * new libxl w/ previous versions of xl
> @IanJ
>
> * Host S3 suspend
> @bguthro, @dariof
>
> * Default [example] XSM policy
> @Stefano to ask Daniel D
>
> * Storage driver domains
> @roger
>
> * HVM pci passthrough
> @anthony
>
> * PV pci passthrough
> @konrad (or @george if he gets to it first)
>
> * Network driver domains
> @George
>
> * Nested virt?
> @intel (chased by George)
>
> * Fix SRIOV test (chase intel)
> @ianj
>
> * Fix bisector to e-mail blame-worthy parties
> @ianj
>
> * Fix xl shutdown
> @ianj
>
> * stub domains
> @athony
>
> * performance benchmarks
> @dario
>
> === Meta-items (composed of other items) ===
>
> * Meta: PVIO NUMA improvements
> - NUMA affinity for vcpus (4.4 possible)
> - PV guest NUMA interface (4.4 possible)
> - Sensible dom0 NUMA layout
> - Toolstack pinning backend thread / virq to appropraite d0 vcpu
> - NUMA-aware ballooning
>
> * xend still in tree (x)
> - xl list -l on a dom0-only system
> - xl list -l doesn't contain tty console port
> - xl Alternate transport support for migration*
> - xl PVSCSI support
> - xl PVUSB support
>
> === Big ticket items ===
>
> * PVH mode (w/ Linux)
> owner: mukesh@oracle, george@citrix
> status (Linux): Acked, waiting for ABI to be nailed down
> status (Xen): Initial version checked in, still nailing down interface
>
> * Update to qemu 1.6
> owner: Anthonyper
> status: In staging, still working out a bug in the VMX code
>
> * Live Migration Support
> owner: Jaeyong Yoo <jaeyong.yoo@samsung.com>
> status: v5 posted, looking good for code freeze
>
> * ARM64 guest
> owner: IanC
> status: v3 posted, v4 in progress. looking good.
>
> * SWIOTLB (kernel side thing)
> owner: Stefano
> status: Pull request sent.
>
> * soft affinity for vcpus (was NUMA affinity for vcpus)
> owner: Dario
> status: v2 posted
>
> * PV guest NUMA interface
> owner: Elena
> status: v3 posted
>
> * libvirt/libxl integration (external)
> - owner: jfehlig@suse, dario@citrix
> - patches posted (should be released before 4.4)
> - migration
> - PCI pass-through
> - In progress
> - integration w/ libvirt's lock manager
> - improved concurrency
>
> * xl USB pass-through for HVM guests using Qemu USB emulation
> prognosis: Good if extended
> owner: George
> status: v6 patch series posted
>
> * libxl: Spice usbredirection support for upstream qemu
> owner: fabio@M2R
> status: I'll post new patch version shortly
>
> * libxl: usb2 and usb3 controller support for upstream qemu
> owner: fabio@M2R
> status: patch v5 posted, tested and working, awaiting reviews
>
> * libxl network buffering support for Remus
> @shriram
> status: patches posted
> prognosis: fair
>
> * Disk: indirect descriptors
> owner: roger@citrix
> status: Linux side in 3.11, Xen-side patch posted
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-19 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-18 18:19 Xen 4.4 development update: Code freezing point reached George Dunlap
2013-11-18 18:52 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-18 19:22 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2013-11-19 16:18 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-19 0:59 ` Don Slutz
2013-11-19 17:46 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-19 10:50 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2013-11-19 11:06 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-19 11:31 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-11-19 14:00 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-19 14:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-19 14:54 ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-19 15:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-19 17:52 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-19 19:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-20 3:17 ` Zhenzhong Duan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528B4280.4090609@citrix.com \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.