From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] X86: enable MPX feature to HVM guest
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:32:14 +0000
Message-ID: <528E277E.1050401@citrix.com>
References: <DE8DF0795D48FD4CA783C40EC8292335013CC86A@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <DE8DF0795D48FD4CA783C40EC8292335013CC86A@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
Cc: "haoxudong.hao@gmail.com" <haoxudong.hao@gmail.com>, "keir@xen.org" <keir@xen.org>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 19/11/13 10:54, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
> From 9d0248fddf86c96efcb16963f0842927cb5c23c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:48:20 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH 5/5] X86: enable MPX feature to HVM guest
>
> Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/xstate.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
> index 1fd43c9..2bc9b60 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
> @@ -373,6 +373,7 @@ int handle_xsetbv(u32 index, u64 new_bv)
>      mask = new_bv & ~curr->arch.xcr0_accum;
>      curr->arch.xcr0 = new_bv;
>      curr->arch.xcr0_accum |= new_bv;
> +    curr->arch.nonlazy_xstate_used = !!(curr->arch.xcr0 & XSTATE_NONLAZY);
>  
>      mask &= curr->fpu_dirtied ? ~XSTATE_FP_SSE : XSTATE_NONLAZY;
>      if ( mask )

This looks like a bug, and unrelated to the patch description?

~Andrew