From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from asav21.altibox.net ([109.247.116.8]:39448 "EHLO asav21.altibox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753245Ab3KVApH (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:45:07 -0500 Message-ID: <528EA90E.2010703@hesbynett.no> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 01:45:02 +0100 From: David Brown MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stan@hardwarefreak.com, joystick CC: James Plank , Ric Wheeler , Andrea Mazzoleni , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, David Smith Subject: Re: Triple parity and beyond References: <528A90B7.5010905@zytor.com> <528AA1EB.3010909@zytor.com> <528BCA2D.5010500@redhat.com> <73BEB41F-0FAC-4108-BEA9-DB6D921F6F55@cs.utk.edu> <528D61C5.70902@hardwarefreak.com> <528DBF85.6010303@shiftmail.org> <528EA5B9.3000801@hardwarefreak.com> In-Reply-To: <528EA5B9.3000801@hardwarefreak.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 22/11/13 01:30, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > I don't like it either. It's a compromise. But as RAID1/10 will soon > be unusable due to URE probability during rebuild, I think it's a > relatively good compromise for some users, some workloads. An alternative is to move to 3-way raid1 mirrors rather than 2-way mirrors. Obviously you take another hit in disk space efficiency, but reads will be faster than you have extra redundancy.