From: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>,
"shuahkhan@gmail.com" <shuahkhan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.13-rc1 is out
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:58:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528FFDB4.3030501@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxK5hkhteiL5cyPtHX5reup6aOiHQTCDKKdBsHiWsroGA@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/22/2013 01:36 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So you had an extra week to prepare your pull requests, and if you
> were planning on sending it in the last two days thinking I'd close
> the merge window on Sunday as usual, I can only laugh derisively in
> your general direction, and call you bad names. Because I'm not
> interested in your excuses. I did warn people about this in the 3.12
> release notes. As it was, there were a few people who cut it fairly
> close today. You know who you are.
>
> If there are pull requests I missed (due to getting caught in spam
> filters, or not matching my normal search patterns), and you think you
> sent your pull request in time but it got overlooked, ping me -
> because I don't have anything pending I know about, but mistakes
> happen.
>
> Talking about mistakes... I suspect it was a mistake to have that
> extra week before the merge window opened, and I probably should just
> have done a 3.12-rc8 instead. Because the linux-next statistics look
> suspicious, and we had extra stuff show up there not just in that
> first week. Clearly people took that "let's have an extra week of
> merge window" and extrapolated it a bit too much. Oh, well. Live and
> learn.
>
> Anyway, other than that small oddity, this was a fairly normal merge
> window. By patch size we had a pretty usual ~55% drivers, 18%
> architecture code, 9% network updates, and the rest is spread out (fs,
> headers, tools, documentation). Featurewise, the big ones are likely
> the nftables and the multi-queue block layer stuff, but depending on
> your interests you might find all the incremental updates to various
> areas interesting. There are some odd ones in there (LE mode Powerpc
> support..)
>
> Go forth and test, and start sending me regression fixes. And really,
> if you didn't send me your pull request in time, don't whine about it.
> Because nobody likes a whiner.
>
3.13-rc1 fails to boot on Samsung Series 9. 3.12.1 is fine and the last
mainline kernel that worked on it was from Nov 14th. It failed to mount
/boot and after doing a manually mounting it, it came up and didn't
detect USB mouse. Looking at the dmesg differences in dmesg, looks like
usb probe fails on USB mouse. I will start a bisect and let you know
what I find.
dmesg 3.13-rc1:
63.637083] PM: Adding info for usb:2-1:1.0
[ 63.637128] driver: '2-1': driver_bound: bound to device 'usb'
[ 63.637136] bus: 'usb': really_probe: bound device 2-1 to driver usb
[ 123.660457] usb 2-1: USB disconnect, device number 3
[ 123.660505] bus: 'usb': remove device 2-1:1.0
[ 123.660508] PM: Removing info for usb:2-1:1.0
[ 123.661718] bus: 'usb': remove device 2-1
[ 123.661724] PM: Removing info for usb:2-1
[ 125.143833] usb 2-1: new low-speed USB device number 4 using xhci_hcd
[ 125.190924] usb 2-1: New USB device found, idVendor=17ef, idProduct=6019
[ 125.190928] usb 2-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=2,
SerialNumber=0
[ 125.190930] usb 2-1: Product: Lenovo Optical USB Mouse
[ 125.191042] bus: 'usb': add device 2-1
[ 125.191054] PM: Adding info for usb:2-1
[ 125.191081] bus: 'usb': driver_probe_device: matched device 2-1 with
driver usb
[ 125.191084] bus: 'usb': really_probe: probing driver usb with device 2-1
[ 125.191097] usb 2-1: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 64 microframes,
ep desc says 80 microframes
[ 125.201952] bus: 'usb': add device 2-1:1.0
[ 125.201959] PM: Adding info for usb:2-1:1.0
[ 125.202010] driver: '2-1': driver_bound: bound to device 'usb'
[ 125.202019] bus: 'usb': really_probe: bound device 2-1 to driver usb
dmesg 3.12.1:
[ 5.562700] bus: 'usb': add driver usbhid
[ 5.562790] bus: 'usb': driver_probe_device: matched device 2-1:1.0
with driv
er usbhid
[ 5.562794] bus: 'usb': really_probe: probing driver usbhid with
device 2-1:1
.0
[ 5.575965] driver: '2-1:1.0': driver_bound: bound to device 'usbhid'
[ 5.575971] bus: 'usb': really_probe: bound device 2-1:1.0 to driver
usbhid
[ 5.575998] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
[ 5.576000] usbhid: USB HID core driver
[ 5.601326] input: Lenovo Optical USB Mouse as
/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.4/0000:03:00.0/usb2/2-1/2-1:1.0/input/input6
[ 5.601796] hid-generic 0003:17EF:6019.0001: input,hidraw0: USB HID
v1.11 Mouse [Lenovo Optical USB Mouse] on usb-0000:03:00.0-1/input0
[ 5.670722] bus: 'usb': add driver btusb
[ 5.670736] bus: 'usb': driver_probe_device: matched device 1-1.5:1.0
with driver btusb
[ 5.670739] bus: 'usb': really_probe: probing driver btusb with
device 1-1.5:1.0
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-23 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-22 20:36 Linux 3.13-rc1 is out Linus Torvalds
2013-11-23 0:43 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-11-23 1:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-23 0:51 ` James Cloos
2013-11-23 2:32 ` Jongman Heo
2013-11-23 0:58 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2013-11-25 0:10 ` linux-next stats (Was: Linux 3.13-rc1 is out) Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528FFDB4.3030501@samsung.com \
--to=shuah.kh@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuahkhan@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.