From: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: long <tlnguyen@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tom.l.nguyen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]2.6.7 MSI-X Update
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:18:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528yefkr6y.fsf@topspin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40D8CE3F.4010306@pobox.com> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:26:39 -0400")
Jeff> hmmmmmmm.
Jeff> Unless it's already inside the lock somehow... it
Jeff> definitely needs to take the lock, one way or another.
At least most (in not all) of the code paths are not inside the lock.
For example pci_enable_msi() is called from a device driver, and it
directly does
dev->bus->ops->read(dev->bus, dev->devfn, msi_control_reg(pos),
2, &control);
as well as calling lots of other functions that do similar stuff.
In fact I don't see how any of the stuff in msi.c could be protected
by pci_lock, since pci_lock is static to access.c and only used inside
the pci_bus_read_config_xxx and pci_bus_write_config_xxx functions
defined there.
- Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-23 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-22 21:48 [PATCH]2.6.7 MSI-X Update long
2004-06-22 23:57 ` Roland Dreier
2004-06-23 0:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-23 1:18 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2004-06-23 3:45 ` Roland Dreier
2004-06-23 16:50 ` Roland Dreier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-22 23:06 Nguyen, Tom L
2004-06-23 16:49 Nguyen, Tom L
2004-06-23 16:58 Nguyen, Tom L
2004-06-23 22:03 Nguyen, Tom L
2004-06-24 1:42 ` Roland Dreier
2004-06-24 6:37 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-06-24 7:27 ` Roland Dreier
2004-06-24 16:29 Nguyen, Tom L
2004-06-26 1:21 long
2004-06-26 0:30 ` [PATCH]2.6.7 " Roland Dreier
2004-06-26 1:38 ` Roland Dreier
2004-06-26 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-26 17:30 ` Roland Dreier
2004-07-13 22:02 long
2004-07-15 2:14 ` [PATCH]2.6.7 " Roland Dreier
2004-07-18 1:25 ` Roland Dreier
2004-07-15 15:46 Nguyen, Tom L
2004-07-19 15:36 Nguyen, Tom L
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528yefkr6y.fsf@topspin.com \
--to=roland@topspin.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tlnguyen@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com \
--cc=tom.l.nguyen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.