From: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
To: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Chinmay V S <cvs268@gmail.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Subject: Re: Why is O_DSYNC on linux so slow / what's wrong with my SSD?
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 19:27:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5290F386.5040806@profihost.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <528FC09E.5090004@redhat.com>
Hi Ric,
Am 22.11.2013 21:37, schrieb Ric Wheeler:
> On 11/22/2013 03:01 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>> Hi Christoph,
>> Am 21.11.2013 11:11, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>>>>
>>>> 2. Some drives may implement CMD_FLUSH to return immediately i.e. no
>>>> guarantee the data is actually on disk.
>>>
>>> In which case they aren't spec complicant. While I've seen countless
>>> data integrity bugs on lower end ATA SSDs I've not seen one that simpliy
>>> ingnores flush. If you'd want to cheat that bluntly you'd be better
>>> of just claiming to not have a writeback cache.
>>>
>>> You solve your performance problem by completely disabling any chance
>>> of having data integrity guarantees, and do so in a way that is not
>>> detectable for applications or users.
>>>
>>> If you have a workload with lots of small synchronous writes disabling
>>> the writeback cache on the disk does indeed often help, especially with
>>> the non-queueable FLUSH on all but the most recent ATA devices.
>>
>> But this isn't correct for drives with capicitors like Crucial m500,
>> Intel DC S3500, DC S3700 isn't it? Shouldn't the linux kernel has an
>> option to disable this for drives like these?
>> /sys/block/sdX/device/ignore_flush
>
> If you know 100% for sure that your drive has a non-volatile write
> cache, you can run the file system without the flushing by mounting "-o
> nobarrier". With most devices, this is not needed since they tend to
> simply ignore the flushes if they know they are power failure safe.
>
> Block level, we did something similar for users who are not running
> through a file system for SCSI devices - James added support to echo
> "temporary" into the sd's device's cache_type field:
>
> See:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=2ee3e26c673e75c05ef8b914f54fadee3d7b9c88
At least to me this does not work. I get the same awful speed as before
- also the I/O waits stay the same. I'm still seeing CMD flushes going
to the devices.
Is there any way to check whether the temporary got accepted and works?
I simply executed:
for i in /sys/class/scsi_disk/*/cache_type; do echo $i; echo temporary
write back >$i; done
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-23 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-20 12:12 Why is O_DSYNC on linux so slow / what's wrong with my SSD? Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-11-20 12:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-11-20 13:34 ` Chinmay V S
2013-11-20 13:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-11-20 14:12 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-11-20 15:22 ` Chinmay V S
2013-11-20 15:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-11-20 15:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-11-20 17:11 ` Chinmay V S
2013-11-20 17:58 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-11-20 18:43 ` Chinmay V S
2013-11-21 10:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-11-22 20:01 ` Stefan Priebe
2013-11-22 20:37 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-11-22 21:05 ` Stefan Priebe
2013-11-23 18:27 ` Stefan Priebe [this message]
2013-11-23 19:35 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-11-23 19:48 ` Stefan Priebe
2013-11-25 7:37 ` Stefan Priebe
2020-01-08 6:58 ` slow sync performance on LSI / Broadcom MegaRaid performance with battery cache Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-11-22 19:57 ` Why is O_DSYNC on linux so slow / what's wrong with my SSD? Stefan Priebe
2013-11-24 0:10 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2013-11-20 16:02 ` Howard Chu
2013-11-23 20:36 ` Pavel Machek
2013-11-23 23:01 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-11-24 0:22 ` Pavel Machek
2013-11-24 1:03 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2013-11-24 2:43 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-11-22 19:55 ` Stefan Priebe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5290F386.5040806@profihost.ag \
--to=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=cvs268@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.