diff for duplicates of <52930C46.801@st.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 0b9fb27..27789ed 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@ Hi Jonathan, ->> Yes, it is, but only for i2c as far as I'm aware, and usually the DT com= -patibles are with - as a separator (I ->> looked into the ePAPR, but couldn't get any explanations or requirements= - on this, even though it's used in all of +>> Yes, it is, but only for i2c as far as I'm aware, and usually the DT compatibles are with - as a separator (I +>> looked into the ePAPR, but couldn't get any explanations or requirements on this, even though it's used in all of >> their examples) > In other discussions, where the defacto i2c device tree bindings have > been followed, the conclusion has been that to change to a - from _ @@ -10,4 +8,4 @@ patibles are with - as a separator (I > the discussion has concluded we can't really avoid it. Ok, I understood the point. Thanks, -Denis= +Denis diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index f80a57b..b5051b9 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,25 +2,15 @@ "ref\0528DF164.8060009@st.com\0" "ref\020131121131402.GF1029@lukather\0" "ref\052926901.9080004@kernel.org\0" - "From\0Denis CIOCCA <denis.ciocca@st.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] DT support for ST micro accelerometers and gyroscopes\0" + "From\0denis.ciocca@st.com (Denis CIOCCA)\0" + "Subject\0[RFC PATCH 0/3] DT support for ST micro accelerometers and gyroscopes\0" "Date\0Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:37:26 +0100\0" - "To\0Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>" - " Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>\0" - "Cc\0Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>" - linux-iio@vger.kernel.org <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org> - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> - Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - Brian Lilly <brian@crystalfontz.com> - Brent-Crosby <brent@crystalfontz.com> - " Jim Wall <jimwall@q.com>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi Jonathan,\n" - ">> Yes, it is, but only for i2c as far as I'm aware, and usually the DT com=\n" - "patibles are with - as a separator (I\n" - ">> looked into the ePAPR, but couldn't get any explanations or requirements=\n" - " on this, even though it's used in all of\n" + ">> Yes, it is, but only for i2c as far as I'm aware, and usually the DT compatibles are with - as a separator (I\n" + ">> looked into the ePAPR, but couldn't get any explanations or requirements on this, even though it's used in all of\n" ">> their examples)\n" "> In other discussions, where the defacto i2c device tree bindings have\n" "> been followed, the conclusion has been that to change to a - from _\n" @@ -28,6 +18,6 @@ "> the discussion has concluded we can't really avoid it.\n" "Ok, I understood the point. Thanks,\n" "\n" - Denis= + Denis -6e38b2c8b3200d9b0db407f996af79c6fcaf0fe9daa555932d3181899e4a8ee3 +a8e69473940601e921bc017c14d0cc6020249219f5b997dabe33cbe3eadc210e
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.