From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arvid Brodin Subject: Re: [PATCH IPROUTE] ip: Add HSR support Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:20:47 +0100 Message-ID: <5293A30F.6030407@alten.se> References: <527D3CCC.3020609@xdin.com> <20131122173334.0ae81887@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen Hemminger To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from spam1.webland.se ([91.207.112.90]:55047 "EHLO spam1.webland.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753723Ab3KYTUu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:20:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20131122173334.0ae81887@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2013-11-23 02:33, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 20:34:36 +0100 > Arvid Brodin wrote: > >> This patch adds basic support for High-Availability Seamless >> Redundancy (HSR) network devices. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arvid Brodin > > Will not apply to current iproute source. The header files have been = updated > to be from current upstream (linus), and the IFLA_HSR doesn't match. So, what's the least annoying (for everyone) way of getting the updated= header file into the kernel _and_ iproute? I guess the iproute patch should be against net-next-for-3.13? (The HSR= kernel patch was picked up into 3.13-rc1.) And the updated kernel patch (with the .fill_info routine implemented a= nd the updated header file), where do I send that? -- Arvid Brodin | Consultant (Linux) ALTEN | Knarrarn=E4sgatan 7 | SE-164 40 Kista | Sweden arvid.brodin@alten.se | www.alten.se/en/ ________________________________ Xdin is changing its name. From 25 November 2013 we will be known as Al= ten. Read more at www.alten.se