Re: [PATCH] module-base: Fix misleading comment

[Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>]

On 13-11-27 08:45 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> The comment was originally written for module.bbclass and is now
> slightly misleading. This updates it to match the current code.

Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>

>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass b/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass
> index 9dbb4b4..1589a90 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass
> @@ -11,11 +11,8 @@ KERNEL_OBJECT_SUFFIX = ".ko"
>   # kernel modules are generally machine specific
>   PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}"
>
> -#
> -# Ensure the hostprogs are available for module compilation. Modules that
> -# inherit this recipe and override do_compile() should be sure to call
> -# do_make_scripts() or ensure the scripts are built independently.
> -#
> +# Function to ensure the kernel scripts are created. Expected to
> +# be called before do_compile. See module.bbclass for an exmaple.
>   do_make_scripts() {
>   	unset CFLAGS CPPFLAGS CXXFLAGS LDFLAGS
>   	make CC="${KERNEL_CC}" LD="${KERNEL_LD}" AR="${KERNEL_AR}" \
>
>