All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: packet: use macro GET_PBDQC_FROM_RB to simplify the codes
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:27:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52971A76.4020202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <529712A7.3010604@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 11/28/2013 10:53 AM, Duan Jiong wrote:
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

Please resubmit when net-next is open.

> ---
>   net/packet/af_packet.c | 10 ++++++----
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> index 2e8286b..955611f 100644
> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> @@ -430,7 +430,8 @@ static void prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer(struct packet_sock *po,
>   {
>   	struct tpacket_kbdq_core *pkc;
>   
> -	pkc = tx_ring ? &po->tx_ring.prb_bdqc : &po->rx_ring.prb_bdqc;
> +	pkc = tx_ring ? GET_PBDQC_FROM_RB(&po->tx_ring)
> +		      : GET_PBDQC_FROM_RB(&po->rx_ring);

Nit: the colon should actually still be on the previous line.

It would be nice if at some point in time we could get rid of these TPACKET_V3 specific
macros and actually use some inline functions.

>   
>   	spin_lock(&rb_queue->lock);
>   	pkc->delete_blk_timer = 1;
> @@ -456,7 +457,8 @@ static void prb_setup_retire_blk_timer(struct packet_sock *po, int tx_ring)
>   	if (tx_ring)
>   		BUG();
>   
> -	pkc = tx_ring ? &po->tx_ring.prb_bdqc : &po->rx_ring.prb_bdqc;
> +	pkc = tx_ring ? GET_PBDQC_FROM_RB(&po->tx_ring)
> +		      : GET_RBDQC_FROM_RB(&po->rx_ring);
>   	prb_init_blk_timer(po, pkc, prb_retire_rx_blk_timer_expired);
>   }
>   
> @@ -514,7 +516,7 @@ static void init_prb_bdqc(struct packet_sock *po,
>   			struct pgv *pg_vec,
>   			union tpacket_req_u *req_u, int tx_ring)
>   {
> -	struct tpacket_kbdq_core *p1 = &rb->prb_bdqc;
> +	struct tpacket_kbdq_core *p1 = GET_PBDQC_FROM_RB(rb);
>   	struct tpacket_block_desc *pbd;
>   
>   	memset(p1, 0x0, sizeof(*p1));
> @@ -578,7 +580,7 @@ static void _prb_refresh_rx_retire_blk_timer(struct tpacket_kbdq_core *pkc)
>   static void prb_retire_rx_blk_timer_expired(unsigned long data)
>   {
>   	struct packet_sock *po = (struct packet_sock *)data;
> -	struct tpacket_kbdq_core *pkc = &po->rx_ring.prb_bdqc;
> +	struct tpacket_kbdq_core *pkc = GET_PBDQC_FROM_RB(&po->rx_ring);
>   	unsigned int frozen;
>   	struct tpacket_block_desc *pbd;
>   
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-28 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-28  9:53 packet: use macro GET_PBDQC_FROM_RB to simplify the codes Duan Jiong
2013-11-28 10:27 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2013-12-02  1:19   ` Duan Jiong
2013-12-02  1:32     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52971A76.4020202@redhat.com \
    --to=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=duanj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.