From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 22:39:04 +0100
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/3] fence_ipmilan: option --method and
 new option --ipmitool-path
In-Reply-To: <602750918.3048711.1385742741085.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
References: <602750918.3048711.1385742741085.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <52990978.2040406@redhat.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 11/29/2013 05:32 PM, Ondrej Mular wrote:

> @@ -147,28 +160,44 @@ def define_new_opts():
>      all_opt["privlvl"] = {
>          "getopt" : "P:",
>          "longopt" : "privlvl",
> -        "help" : "-P, --privlvl=[level]    Privilege level on IPMI device (callback|user|operator|administrator)",
> +        "help" : "-P, --privlvl=[level]          Privilege level on IPMI device (callback|user|operator|administrator)",

All the reformatting and cosmetic changes should be in a separate commit.

Also, this patch assumes that the first patch you posted is applied to
the tree. It's not. Sending incremental patches over patches makes it
difficult to rebuild the final binary and test it (yes I have ipmi
devices at home :))

Fabio