From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update QEMU_UPSTREAM_REVISION Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:30:06 +0000 Message-ID: <529C6F3E.2090904@eu.citrix.com> References: <1385573462.30237.50.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1385667890-821-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <1385722374.25763.14.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1385722374.25763.14.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Anthony PERARD Cc: Stefano Stabellini , Ian Jackson , Xen Devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 11/29/2013 10:52 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 19:44 +0000, Anthony PERARD wrote: >> Changing to master, otherwise we don't get the last updates. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD > Acked-by: Ian Campbell > > WRT the release this patch is equivalent to "we should move to qemu > 1.6". Did that get an exception already / is it on the list? > > (please don't forget to CC George at this stage in the release for his > Ack, or to reference an existing release ack he gave) Actually, isn't this "Fix incorrect assignment of a specific revision instead of most-recently-passed for development branch"? It's the push into the qemu tree that would require a release ack, but that happened a month ago before the code freeze IIRC. -George