From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: improve guest-receive-side flow control
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:59:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529C7622.90901@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD019C3D2@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
On 02/12/13 11:55, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Vrabel
>> Sent: 02 December 2013 11:52
>> To: Paul Durrant
>> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Wei Liu; Ian Campbell
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: improve guest-receive-side flow
>> control
>>
>> On 28/11/13 13:11, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>> The flow control code relies on a double pass of tke skb, firstly to count
>>> the number of ring slots needed to supply sufficient grant references, and
>>> another to actually consume those references and build the grant copy
>>> operations. It transpires that, in some scenarios, the initial count and the
>>> number of references consumed differs and, after this happens a number
>> of
>>> times, flow control is completely broken.
>>
>> Can you describe in more detail the cases where it gets it wrong?
>>
>
> I've already elaborated on this thread (at Annie Li's request). That
> explanation is probably a little long for inclusion in the comment though.
I understand that count_slot() going wrong is bad. What specifically is
it counting incorrectly. What frag layout is causing it? If this is
understood there may be a more more minimal patch we can mark for stable.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-02 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-28 13:11 [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: improve guest-receive-side flow control Paul Durrant
2013-11-28 15:51 ` Wei Liu
2013-11-28 16:05 ` Paul Durrant
2013-11-28 16:27 ` Wei Liu
2013-11-28 16:33 ` Paul Durrant
2013-11-28 16:44 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-02 11:53 ` David Vrabel
2013-11-29 8:20 ` annie li
2013-11-29 10:03 ` Paul Durrant
2013-12-01 4:18 ` annie li
2013-12-02 10:52 ` Paul Durrant
2013-12-02 11:52 ` David Vrabel
2013-12-02 11:55 ` Paul Durrant
2013-12-02 11:59 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2013-12-02 12:01 ` Paul Durrant
2013-12-03 20:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529C7622.90901@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.