Re: [PATCH] sctp: make the max_burst min value to 1

[Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com>]

On 2013/12/2 19:56, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 02:51:45PM +0800, Wang Weidong wrote:
>> From: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com>
>>
>> when I setted the max_burst to 0, do the lksctp-tools I got hang.
>> I found sctp_transport_burst_limited would make the cwnd to 0.
>> so I make the max_burst min value to 1.
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  net/sctp/sysctl.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sysctl.c b/net/sctp/sysctl.c
>> index 7637e8e..46832d3 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/sysctl.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/sysctl.c
>> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static struct ctl_table sctp_net_table[] = {
>>  		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
>>  		.mode		= 0644,
>>  		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_minmax,
>> -		.extra1		= &zero,
>> +		.extra1		= &one,
>>  		.extra2		= &int_max
>>  	},
>>  	{
>> -- 
>> 1.7.12
>>
>>
> 
> 
> This seems like a band-aid to me.  There are a few things wrong:
> 
> 1) You can also set the the max_burst via setsockopt, and so this would need to
> be checked in that path as well.
> 
> 2) I don't see how having a cwnd of zero would cause a hang.  It looks like a
> cwnd of zero would perpetually place the association in a slow start state,
> which is silly but not illegal.  
> 

Hm, Good suggestions. Ok, I will try it again and find the root cause.
Thanks!

> Please investigate the acutally root cause of the problem before just avoiding
> it like this.
> 
> Thanks!
> Neil
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
>