Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: check the rto_min and rto_max

[Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com>]

On 2013/12/2 9:45, Wang Weidong wrote:
> rto_min should be smaller than rto_max while rto_max should be larger
> than rto_min. so just add the check.
> 
> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  net/sctp/sysctl.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sysctl.c b/net/sctp/sysctl.c
> index 6b36561..7637e8e 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sysctl.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sysctl.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static struct ctl_table sctp_net_table[] = {
>  		.mode		= 0644,
>  		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_minmax,
>  		.extra1         = &one,
> -		.extra2         = &timer_max
> +		.extra2         = &init_net.sctp.rto_max
>  	},
>  	{
>  		.procname	= "rto_max",
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static struct ctl_table sctp_net_table[] = {
>  		.maxlen		= sizeof(unsigned int),
>  		.mode		= 0644,
>  		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_minmax,
> -		.extra1         = &one,
> +		.extra1         = &init_net.sctp.rto_min,
>  		.extra2         = &timer_max
>  	},
>  	{
> 

Hi Neil,

As you point out that in "[PATCH] sctp: make the max_burst min value to 1":
> 1) You can also set the the max_burst via setsockopt, and so this would need to
> be checked in that path as well.

we can set the rto_min/rto_max via setsockopt. Should I check it in the path as well?

Thanks.