All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Nathan Studer <nate.studer@dornerworks.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Simon Martin <smartin@milliways.cl>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Robert VanVossen <robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] arinc: Implement cpu-pool support
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:20:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <529F101A.2010505@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386109467-9095-1-git-send-email-nate.studer@dornerworks.com>

On 12/03/2013 10:24 PM, Nathan Studer wrote:
> From: Nathan Studer <nate.studer@dornerworks.com>
>
> Update the arinc653 scheduler to support CPU cpu pools.
>
> These changes do not implement arinc653 multicore.  Since the schedule only
> supports 1 vcpu entry per slot, even if the vcpus of a domain are run on
> multiple pcpus, the scheduler will essentially serialize their execution.
>
> The formatting patch from the original series has already been applied and
> has been dropped from v2.
>
> George, you granted a release-ack for the original series, which I sent
> in almost two weeks ago (I left on paternity leave in the meantime).
> I would argue that this functionality could be granted an exception for
> the same reasons you listed in your original release-ack, but if this is
> no longer the case, I defer to your judgement.

Just as a reminder, the original reasons were that the changes are 
limited to arinc653-related code, and that there are as far as we know 
no other users at present.

Release-acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-04 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-03 22:24 [PATCH v2 0/2] arinc: Implement cpu-pool support Nathan Studer
2013-12-03 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arinc: Add cpu-pool support to scheduler Nathan Studer
2013-12-04 11:00   ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-03 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arinc: Add poolid parameter to scheduler get/set functions Nathan Studer
2013-12-04 10:50   ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-04 11:20 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2013-12-04 14:30   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] arinc: Implement cpu-pool support Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=529F101A.2010505@eu.citrix.com \
    --to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=nate.studer@dornerworks.com \
    --cc=robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com \
    --cc=smartin@milliways.cl \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.