From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gary@mlbassoc.com>
Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105])
	by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34189E007A1
	for <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>;
	Wed,  4 Dec 2013 04:23:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998)
	id 85236F811DF; Wed,  4 Dec 2013 05:23:53 -0700 (MST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
	hermes.chez-thomas.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114])
	by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7CBF811DE;
	Wed,  4 Dec 2013 05:23:51 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <529F1EFE.9080600@mlbassoc.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 05:24:30 -0700
From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
References: <CAB3sqtbfEhcect+mHToy8f-U2X0V5OTeD5-QO7g4RMtNH-ZZeQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAB3sqtaFGew9itMnipagU8uMLSr2R+eyoCz3wxbWQcxtE_ZSmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP9ODKqoxDox_tz7wad9=aXNi7Kzr0gaXPPKZrgPaOvWPWHm+A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKqoxDox_tz7wad9=aXNi7Kzr0gaXPPKZrgPaOvWPWHm+A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: i.MX6Q VPU firmware missing for core-image-basic
X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers
	<meta-freescale.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale>
List-Post: <mailto:meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:23:55 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2013-12-04 05:13, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Tarek El-Sherbiny
> <tarek.elsherbiny@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I mad some progress now.
>>
>> core-imgae-base ---> VPU FW is included.
>> core-imgae-basic ---> VPU FW is not included. !!!!?
>>
>> Does anyone understand why?
>>
>> I know that the firmware is picked up in MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS variable
>> but I don't know why it affects only core-imgae-base and not
>> core-imgae-basic !
>>
>> Hope someone could shed some light here.
>
> core-image-base: A console-only image that fully supports the target
> device hardware.
> ...
> core-image-basic: A console-only image with more full-featured Linux
> system functionality installed.
>
> The image names are misleading, I agree. Please bring this to OE-Core
> for discussion.
>

I sent a patch for this to OE-core in October which seems to have
been ignored :-(
   http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-October/085750.html

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------