From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56911) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VoBt8-000827-QQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 07:49:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VoBt1-0001lr-9E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 07:49:10 -0500 Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:13112) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VoBt1-0001ll-31 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 07:49:03 -0500 Received: from eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245]) by mailout2.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MXA0050V8XONI70@mailout2.w1.samsung.com> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:49:00 +0000 (GMT) Message-id: <529F24BB.10608@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:48:59 +0400 From: Fedorov Sergey MIME-version: 1.0 References: <1386060535-15908-1-git-send-email-s.fedorov@samsung.com> <529EFF1C.1010701@samsung.com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/21] target-arm: add CPU core TrustZone support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Johannes Winter , a.basov@samsung.com, QEMU Developers On 12/04/2013 03:13 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 4 December 2013 10:08, Fedorov Sergey wrote: >> On 12/03/2013 12:48 PM, Sergey Fedorov wrote: >>> This patch set implements a basic support of CPU core TrustZone feature. >> We'd like this patch series finally to be merged into mainstream. What >> should be done to achieve this goal? > I'd like to see TZ support in mainline too. That is the most important for me now :-) So I will try these patches to get shape suitable for mainline. Thanks! > The high level answer > is that it needs to get code reviewed, and you need to fix issues > that are raised in code review. Unfortunately my review queue is > currently pretty full (it has Allwinner board support, DIGIC board > support, a bunch of Cadence fixes, ARMv8 32 bit new instructions > and the A64 64 bit instruction support in it, all of which are fairly > big patchsets), so it may take me a little while to get to this > patchset. It is on my todo list though, so it won't get forgotten :-) > > thanks > -- PMM > Best regards, Sergey Fedorov