From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC part1 PATCH 4/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce the skeleton of
 _PDC related for ARM64
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:17:39 +0800
Message-ID: <529F3983.5000200@linaro.org>
References: <1386088611-2801-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1386088611-2801-5-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20131203165318.2c04a8bf@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131203165318.2c04a8bf@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>, patches@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>, Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

On 2013=E5=B9=B412=E6=9C=8804=E6=97=A5 00:53, One Thousand Gnomes wrote=
:
> O> +enum idle_boot_override { IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE =3D 0, IDLE_HALT, IDLE=
_NOMWAIT,
>> +			IDLE_POLL, IDLE_FORCE_MWAIT };
> This should probably move out of the arch directory to be a single en=
um
> including both platforms values. That will make it rather easier to k=
eep
> sane and avoid ifdefs around which definitions are for which processo=
r.

Thank you very much for the suggestion, it makes sense to me, will figu=
re
out how to implement it.

Thanks
Hanjun

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:17:39 +0800
Subject: [RFC part1 PATCH 4/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce the skeleton of
 _PDC related for ARM64
In-Reply-To: <20131203165318.2c04a8bf@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
References: <1386088611-2801-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
 <1386088611-2801-5-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
 <20131203165318.2c04a8bf@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Message-ID: <529F3983.5000200@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 2013?12?04? 00:53, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> O> +enum idle_boot_override { IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE = 0, IDLE_HALT, IDLE_NOMWAIT,
>> +			IDLE_POLL, IDLE_FORCE_MWAIT };
> This should probably move out of the arch directory to be a single enum
> including both platforms values. That will make it rather easier to keep
> sane and avoid ifdefs around which definitions are for which processor.

Thank you very much for the suggestion, it makes sense to me, will figure
out how to implement it.

Thanks
Hanjun